Jean Luc BOURGAULT

11:16:12

Finish time

9,871 / 12,733

Overall

Where you finished

Pool	Place	Of
Overall	9,871	12,733
Men	9,401	12,071
M10	18	49

What it took

Pool	Winner	Median
Overall	5:20:20+5:55:52	9:55:19+1:20:53
Men	5:20:20+5:55:52	9:53:09+1:23:03
M10	6:59:53+4:16:19	11:38:45−22:33

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 2nd fastest Jean Luc of 5. The quickest one did 9:58:01, the median Jean Luc 11:18:17.

See the whole Jean Luc ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the M10 median was on Col du Galibier — 7:37 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

The story of your day comes down to a single tough section. On the Col du Galibier, you were about 8 minutes slower than the M10 median, and that single climb is the main reason your overall time isn't lower. That's balanced out somewhat by the Col de la Croix de Fer, where you gained back about 19 minutes on the same M10 median. Put your next training cycle's climbing focus on pacing through sections like Col du Galibier — that's where you gave back the most time.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00

Jean Luc BOURGAULT0 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Jean Luc BOURGAULT moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

Climbs & segments

Segment	Time	Rank	Top %	vs median
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley	28:28	6,956	48%	−0:08
Col de la Croix de FerClimb	1:56:26	7,398	52%	+53s
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley	1:30:25	7,644	55%	+2:30
Col du TélégrapheClimb	1:26:36	12,041	87%	+17:49
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley	19:35	10,887	81%	+6:09
Col du GalibierClimb	2:25:29	11,025	88%	+30:04
Descente du GalibierDescent	1:02:01	8,115	65%	+4:54
Col de SarenneClimb	1:43:38	10,673	85%	+18:58
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent	23:34	8,349	67%	+1:53
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined	5:48:31	10,492	84%	+49:41
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined	1:25:35	7,920	64%	+6:03

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

Segment	You	Stage winner	M10 leader	GC avg / median	M10 avg / median
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer	28:28	Hugo VALADIER 20:51	Sylvain OSKWAREK 21:26	28:36 / 28:36	31:01 / 30:28
Col de la Croix de Fer	1:56:26	Simon COMBES 1:05:13	Sylvain OSKWAREK 1:20:51	1:55:29 / 1:55:33	2:15:34 / 2:15:17
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne	1:30:25	Antoine BERGER 52:00	Sylvain OSKWAREK 1:01:44	1:28:54 / 1:27:55	1:41:30 / 1:39:21
Col du Télégraphe	1:26:36	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	Sylvain OSKWAREK 46:53	1:10:11 / 1:08:47	1:27:20 / 1:26:02
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)	19:35	Robin BOURDIER 7:46	Sylvain OSKWAREK 9:06	15:48 / 13:26	19:01 / 17:23
Col du Galibier	2:25:29	Luca CAVALLO 50:25	Sylvain OSKWAREK 1:16:08	1:56:29 / 1:55:25	2:17:04 / 2:17:52
Descente du Galibier	1:02:01	Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38	Dominique BRIAND 42:35	58:21 / 57:07	1:01:00 / 1:01:14
Col de Sarenne	1:43:38	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	Sylvain OSKWAREK 1:03:32	1:26:19 / 1:24:40	1:41:47 / 1:42:48
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez	23:34	Gustave BRUYER 3:39	Sylvain OSKWAREK 16:51	22:12 / 21:41	25:25 / 24:38
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)	5:48:31	Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49	Sylvain OSKWAREK 3:23:52	4:57:35 / 4:58:50	5:44:43 / 5:48:31
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)	1:25:35	Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15	Sylvain OSKWAREK 1:00:13	1:20:41 / 1:19:32	1:26:12 / 1:26:13

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

Checkpoint	Km	Time	Rank	vs median
START	0	0:00	—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer	14.8	28:28	6,851	−0:08
Col de la Croix de Fer	38.5	2:24:54	7,207	+39s
Pied de Col du Télégraphe	80.1	3:55:19	7,228	+2:31
Col du Télégraphe	92	5:21:55	8,893	+19:57
Pied de Col du Galibier	97.3	5:41:30	8,647	+22:42
Tunnel du Galibier	114.6	7:58:20	10,688	+53:14
Activation Canyon	115	7:59:39	9,702	+56:31
Col du Galibier	115.6	8:06:59	10,192	+58:09
Pied de Col de Sarenne	140.2	9:09:00	9,643	+1h00
Col de Sarenne	161	10:52:38	9,761	+1h17
FINISH	170	11:16:12	9,871	+1h20

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct, with nothing on it that names you. More in the privacy notice.

Ask me to remove my name

Your other races on this site are not linked to this page unless you ask. If you would like them listed here, use “Link my races” at the top of this page.

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.