Nicolas Sitter
L’Étape du Tour 2026

Bib #9252 · M3

Frederic CARTIEAUX

Compare with other riders
12:03:37
Finish time
11,737 / 12,733
Overall
Where you finished
PoolPlaceOf
Overall11,73712,733
Men11,15012,071
M31,7071,822
What it took
PoolWinnerMedian
Overall5:20:20+6:43:179:55:19+2:08:18
Men5:20:20+6:43:179:53:09+2:10:28
M35:36:41+6:26:569:41:59+2:21:38

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 105th fastest Frederic of 115. The quickest one did 6:59:33, the median Frederic 10:01:02.

See the whole Frederic ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Also rode L'Étape du Tour Femmes 2026name match
DNS

One of the 1,586 riders who entered both Étapes this year — see the doublé analysis.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the M3 median was on Col du Galibier — 57:32 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

The Col du Galibier was an outsized loss on a tough day overall: 170 minutes 40 seconds against an M3 median of 113 minutes 8 seconds, nearly 58 minutes behind, by far your worst segment. Every other climb and descent also ran behind the category median, if less dramatically, with the Maurienne valley section costing about 19 minutes on its own. Given the scale of the Galibier gap specifically, it's worth checking whether something interrupted that climb rather than treating it purely as a fitness gap. At 11,737th out of 12,733, that segment is the clear priority for your next attempt.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00
Croix de FerTélégrapheGalibierSarenneFinishkm 0km 170FC
Frederic CARTIEAUX0 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Frederic CARTIEAUX moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

overall rank along the course (up = better)

Climbs & segments

SegmentTimeRank
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley32:1712,453
Col de la Croix de FerClimb2:03:129,543
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley1:44:5311,196
Col du TélégrapheClimb1:22:1011,227
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley17:029,726
Col du GalibierClimb2:50:4012,317
Descente du GalibierDescent1:07:009,733
Col de SarenneClimb1:34:048,765
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent32:1912,261
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined6:16:0211,874
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined1:39:1910,945

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

SegmentYouStage winner
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer32:17Hugo VALADIER 20:51
Col de la Croix de Fer2:03:12Simon COMBES 1:05:13
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne1:44:53Antoine BERGER 52:00
Col du Télégraphe1:22:10Luca CAVALLO 33:04
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)17:02Robin BOURDIER 7:46
Col du Galibier2:50:40Luca CAVALLO 50:25
Descente du Galibier1:07:00Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38
Col de Sarenne1:34:04Luca CAVALLO 39:52
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez32:19Gustave BRUYER 3:39
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)6:16:02Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)1:39:19Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

CheckpointTimeRank
START0:00—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer32:1712,099
Col de la Croix de Fer2:35:299,930
Pied de Col du Télégraphe4:20:2210,505
Col du Télégraphe5:42:3210,852
Pied de Col du Galibier5:59:3410,144
Tunnel du Galibier8:41:4212,991
Activation Canyon8:42:5811,736
Col du Galibier8:50:1412,320
Pied de Col de Sarenne9:57:1412,039
Col de Sarenne11:31:1811,343
FINISH12:03:3711,737

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

8 races on this site

7 finishes across 2 events, matched by name.

L'Étape du Tour7 times
2022L'Étape du Tour 2022 — Briançon → Alpe d'HuezM39:52:56#4,711
2023L'Étape du Tour 2023 — Annemasse → MorzineM28:55:28#6,946
2024L'Étape du Tour 2024 — Nice → Col de la CouilloleM37:22:38#2,466
2025L'Étape du Tour de France Femmes 2025 — 117 kmM35:52:28#1,137
2025L'Étape du Tour de France 2025M39:10:55#9,753
2026L’Étape du Tour de France — this pageM312:03:37#11,737
2026117 kmDNS
Run in Lyon — Marathon1 time
2024Run in Lyon 2024 — MarathonM0H3:24:47#590

These are rows sharing the same first and last name. A name is only shown as one career when no single race ever contained two people with it — which rules out the names that are provably shared, but cannot rule out two strangers who never lined up together. If one of these is not you, the removal link at the foot of this page applies to it too.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.