Amélie CRETTENAND

11:47:14

Finish time

11,171 / 12,733

Overall

Where you finished

Pool	Place	Of
Overall	11,171	12,733
Women	554	662
W2	131	150

What it took

Pool	Winner	Median
Overall	5:20:20+6:26:54	9:55:19+1:51:55
Women	6:19:12+5:28:02	10:26:42+1:20:32
W2	6:19:12+5:28:02	10:11:56+1:35:18

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 5th fastest Amélie of 6. The quickest one did 9:25:27, the median Amélie 11:13:02.

See the whole Amélie ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the W2 median was on Col de Sarenne — 25:52 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

You landed 11171th of 12733 riders in category W2; the segment-level view adds a lot of nuance to that number. The clearest gap opened on Col de Sarenne, where you ran roughly 26 minutes slower than the W2 median. The smallest gap of the day came on Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire), at roughly 15 seconds behind the W2 median. For next time, a block of structured climbing intervals aimed at Col de Sarenne specifically could close most of that gap.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00

Amélie CRETTENAND0 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Amélie CRETTENAND moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

Climbs & segments

Segment	Time	Rank	Top %	vs median
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley	32:15	12,415	86%	+3:39
Col de la Croix de FerClimb	2:14:48	12,367	87%	+19:15
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley	1:36:31	9,196	66%	+8:36
Col du TélégrapheClimb	1:21:40	11,101	80%	+12:53
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley	13:58	7,397	55%	+32s
Col du GalibierClimb	2:22:41	10,741	86%	+27:16
Descente du GalibierDescent	1:08:38	10,149	81%	+11:31
Col de SarenneClimb	1:51:38	11,577	93%	+26:58
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent	25:05	9,802	78%	+3:24
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined	5:59:09	11,129	89%	+1h00
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined	1:33:43	9,990	81%	+14:11

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

Segment	You	Stage winner	W2 leader	GC avg / median	W2 avg / median
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer	32:15	Hugo VALADIER 20:51	Aurore PAUCHET 21:23	28:36 / 28:36	29:28 / 29:23
Col de la Croix de Fer	2:14:48	Simon COMBES 1:05:13	Victoria STANSFIELD 1:16:20	1:55:29 / 1:55:33	2:01:04 / 2:00:42
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne	1:36:31	Antoine BERGER 52:00	Victoria STANSFIELD 1:00:00	1:28:54 / 1:27:55	1:33:32 / 1:32:08
Col du Télégraphe	1:21:40	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	Victoria STANSFIELD 42:32	1:10:11 / 1:08:47	1:12:34 / 1:10:54
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)	13:58	Robin BOURDIER 7:46	Victoria STANSFIELD 8:17	15:48 / 13:26	15:12 / 13:44
Col du Galibier	2:22:41	Luca CAVALLO 50:25	Victoria STANSFIELD 1:01:58	1:56:29 / 1:55:25	1:58:09 / 1:58:15
Descente du Galibier	1:08:38	Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38	Victoria STANSFIELD 38:48	58:21 / 57:07	1:01:25 / 1:00:24
Col de Sarenne	1:51:38	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	Carmen BROGER 58:25	1:26:19 / 1:24:40	1:26:25 / 1:25:46
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez	25:05	Gustave BRUYER 3:39	Carmen BROGER 15:53	22:12 / 21:41	23:02 / 22:24
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)	5:59:09	Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49	Victoria STANSFIELD 3:00:50	4:57:35 / 4:58:50	5:07:32 / 5:05:56
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)	1:33:43	Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15	Kim FEGER 56:52	1:20:41 / 1:19:32	1:24:34 / 1:24:20

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

Checkpoint	Km	Time	Rank	vs median
START	0	0:00	—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer	14.8	32:15	12,068	+3:39
Col de la Croix de Fer	38.5	2:47:03	12,146	+22:48
Pied de Col du Télégraphe	80.1	4:23:34	10,926	+30:46
Col du Télégraphe	92	5:45:14	11,059	+43:16
Pied de Col du Galibier	97.3	5:59:12	10,102	+40:24
Tunnel du Galibier	114.6	8:12:06	11,554	+1h07
Activation Canyon	115	8:13:28	10,474	+1h10
Col du Galibier	115.6	8:21:53	11,063	+1h13
Pied de Col de Sarenne	140.2	9:30:31	10,811	+1h22
Col de Sarenne	161	11:22:09	11,014	+1h47
FINISH	170	11:47:14	11,171	+1h51

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct, with nothing on it that names you. More in the privacy notice.

Ask me to remove my name

Your other races on this site are not linked to this page unless you ask. If you would like them listed here, use “Link my races” at the top of this page.

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.