| Pool | Place | Of |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 614 | 12,733 |
| Men | 605 | 12,071 |
| M5 | 16 | 1,255 |
| Pool | Winner | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5:20:20+1:45:19 | 9:55:19−2:49:40 |
| Men | 5:20:20+1:45:19 | 9:53:09−2:47:30 |
| M5 | 6:04:50+1:00:49 | 10:12:13−3:06:34 |
Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.
The fun ranking
The 5th fastest Cédric of 72. The quickest one did 6:11:45, the median Cédric 9:26:46.
See the whole Cédric ranking →Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.
Club ranking
The only Spoc finisher to be classified.
See the whole Spoc club page →Among classified finishers from this club only, ties sharing a place. This is not the club classification, which scores each club on its 3 best times.
Your AI ride analysis
Between the climbs, the descents and the transfers, Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer was the sticking point, costing you roughly about 14 minutes against the M5 median. The gap held up against the all-category field median too: about 14 minutes on Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer. That points to tightening up group positioning and pacing on transfers like Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer as the highest-value fix.
Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.
Race position along the course
Climbs & segments
| Segment | Time | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley | 42:38 | 14,286 |
| Col de la Croix de FerClimb | mat missed at Col de la Croix de Fer | — |
| Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley | mat missed at Col de la Croix de Fer | — |
| Col du TélégrapheClimb | mat missed at Pied de Col du Télégraphe | — |
| Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley | mat missed at Col du Télégraphe | — |
| Col du GalibierClimb | mat missed at Pied de Col du Galibier | — |
| Descente du GalibierDescent | mat missed at Col du Galibier | — |
| Col de SarenneClimb | mat missed at Col de Sarenne | — |
| Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent | mat missed at Col de Sarenne | — |
| Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined | incomplete mat data | — |
| Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined | incomplete mat data | — |
“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.
How you compare, climb by climb
| Segment | You | Stage winner |
|---|---|---|
| Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer | 42:38 | Hugo VALADIER 20:51 |
“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.
Checkpoint splits
| Checkpoint | Time | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| START | 0:00 | — |
| Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer | 42:38 | 13,781 |
| Pied de Col de Sarenne | 5:53:30 | 694 |
| FINISH | 7:05:39 | 614 |
Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.
Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.
Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.
One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.