Nicolas Sitter
L’Étape du Tour 2026

Bib #741 · M5 · ECS Sartrouville

8:47:12
Finish time
3,506 / 12,733
Overall
Where you finished
PoolPlaceOf
Overall3,50612,733
Men3,40412,071
M52751,255
What it took
PoolWinnerMedian
Overall5:20:20+3:26:529:55:19−1:08:07
Men5:20:20+3:26:529:53:09−1:05:57
M56:04:50+2:42:2210:12:13−1:25:01

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 19th fastest Aurélien of 44. The quickest one did 6:13:56, the median Aurélien 9:08:16.

See the whole Aurélien ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Club ranking

The only ECS Sartrouville finisher to be classified.

See the whole ECS Sartrouville club page →

Among classified finishers from this club only, ties sharing a place. This is not the club classification, which scores each club on its 3 best times.

Strong across the board: you beat the M5 median on every climb and descent — closest margin on Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez.

Your AI ride analysis

Every split tells the same story here: consistently ahead of the M5 median. You carved out about 21 minutes on the Col du Galibier climb versus the M5 median, the biggest single swing in your favor. You were also about 17 minutes up on the descent and valley run through the Maurienne, so it wasn't a one-segment fluke. That kind of climbing form is exactly what to keep training toward for next year.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00
Croix de FerTélégrapheGalibierSarenneFinishkm 0km 170AB
Aurélien BIGNON0 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Aurélien BIGNON moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

overall rank along the course (up = better)

Climbs & segments

SegmentTimeRank
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley27:115,182
Col de la Croix de FerClimb1:44:223,871
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley1:13:043,113
Col du TélégrapheClimb1:03:514,926
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley10:322,406
Col du GalibierClimb1:38:052,951
Descente du GalibierDescent48:412,993
Col de SarenneClimb1:20:064,904
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent21:205,796
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined4:26:183,370
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined1:10:013,337

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

SegmentYouStage winner
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer27:11Hugo VALADIER 20:51
Col de la Croix de Fer1:44:22Simon COMBES 1:05:13
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne1:13:04Antoine BERGER 52:00
Col du Télégraphe1:03:51Luca CAVALLO 33:04
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)10:32Robin BOURDIER 7:46
Col du Galibier1:38:05Luca CAVALLO 50:25
Descente du Galibier48:41Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38
Col de Sarenne1:20:06Luca CAVALLO 39:52
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez21:20Gustave BRUYER 3:39
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)4:26:18Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)1:10:01Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

CheckpointTimeRank
START0:00—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer27:115,115
Col de la Croix de Fer2:11:333,993
Pied de Col du Télégraphe3:24:373,450
Col du Télégraphe4:28:283,701
Pied de Col du Galibier4:39:003,362
Tunnel du Galibier6:09:383,530
Activation Canyon6:10:443,275
Col du Galibier6:17:053,412
Pied de Col de Sarenne7:05:463,299
Col de Sarenne8:25:523,268
FINISH8:47:123,506

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

8 races on this site

8 finishes across 4 events, matched by name.

L'Étape du Tour4 times
2016L'Étape du Tour 2016 — Megève → MorzineM2-H4:55:05#1,168
2019L'Étape du Tour 2019 — Albertville → Val ThorensM36:06:27#503
2024L'Étape du Tour 2024 — Nice → Col de la CouilloleM46:25:26#852
2026L’Étape du Tour de France — this pageM58:47:12#3,506
Run in Lyon — 10 km2 times
2024Run in Lyon 2024 — 10 kmM2H51:04#2,077
2025Run in Lyon 2025 — 10 kmM3H48:36#1,636
Marathon de Paris1 time
2025Marathon de Paris 2025SEH3:56:23#21,762
La Marmotte Granfondo Alpes1 time
2025La Marmotte Granfondo Alpes 2025M408:25:11#1,160

These are rows sharing the same first and last name. A name is only shown as one career when no single race ever contained two people with it — which rules out the names that are provably shared, but cannot rule out two strangers who never lined up together. If one of these is not you, the removal link at the foot of this page applies to it too.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.