Bib #6780 · M4

Tom LLOYD

10:56:56

Finish time

9,013 / 12,733

Overall

Where you finished

Pool	Place	Of
Overall	9,013	12,733
Men	8,599	12,071
M4	1,058	1,439

What it took

Pool	Winner	Median
Overall	5:20:20+5:36:36	9:55:19+1:01:37
Men	5:20:20+5:36:36	9:53:09+1:03:47
M4	5:55:40+5:01:16	9:53:35+1:03:21

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 35th fastest Tom of 50. The quickest one did 6:34:34, the median Tom 10:03:01.

See the whole Tom ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the M4 median was on Descente + vallée de la Maurienne — 34:27 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

You crossed the line 9,013th of 12,733 riders in M4. Nowhere did you look better than on the Col du Galibier, about 7 minutes ahead of the M4 median. The Descente + vallée de la Maurienne was where the wheels came off pace-wise, about 34 minutes slower than the M4 median. The Descente + vallée de la Maurienne is often about drafting and group tactics — working on staying in a paceline there should recover time.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00

Tom LLOYD0 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Tom LLOYD moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

Climbs & segments

Segment	Time	Rank	Top %	vs median
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley	31:51	12,020	84%	+3:15
Col de la Croix de FerClimb	1:58:26	8,062	57%	+2:53
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley	2:01:19	13,371	96%	+33:24
Col du TélégrapheClimb	1:09:34	7,203	52%	+47s
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley	26:21	12,354	92%	+12:55
Col du GalibierClimb	1:46:52	4,570	36%	−8:33
Descente du GalibierDescent	1:16:06	11,526	92%	+18:59
Col de SarenneClimb	1:21:47	5,384	43%	−2:53
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent	24:40	9,409	75%	+2:59
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined	4:54:52	5,862	47%	−3:58
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined	1:40:46	11,125	90%	+21:14

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

Segment	You	Stage winner	M4 leader	GC avg / median	M4 avg / median
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer	31:51	Hugo VALADIER 20:51	Sebastian DRUSZKIEWICZ 20:54	28:36 / 28:36	28:32 / 28:46
Col de la Croix de Fer	1:58:26	Simon COMBES 1:05:13	Sebastian DRUSZKIEWICZ 1:07:54	1:55:29 / 1:55:33	1:55:24 / 1:54:50
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne	2:01:19	Antoine BERGER 52:00	Alexandre BANEGAS 56:28	1:28:54 / 1:27:55	1:28:40 / 1:26:52
Col du Télégraphe	1:09:34	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	Alexandre BANEGAS 38:57	1:10:11 / 1:08:47	1:09:43 / 1:08:09
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)	26:21	Robin BOURDIER 7:46	Alexandre BANEGAS 7:59	15:48 / 13:26	15:41 / 13:28
Col du Galibier	1:46:52	Luca CAVALLO 50:25	Jonathan LEMAITRE 1:00:24	1:56:29 / 1:55:25	1:56:02 / 1:53:56
Descente du Galibier	1:16:06	Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38	Alexandre BANEGAS 37:18	58:21 / 57:07	58:24 / 56:50
Col de Sarenne	1:21:47	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	Naoto SAITA 50:07	1:26:19 / 1:24:40	1:26:23 / 1:24:05
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez	24:40	Gustave BRUYER 3:39	Baptiste COUSTET 14:19	22:12 / 21:41	22:08 / 21:39
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)	4:54:52	Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49	Alexandre BANEGAS 2:50:13	4:57:35 / 4:58:50	4:56:45 / 4:56:26
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)	1:40:46	Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15	Baptiste COUSTET 52:33	1:20:41 / 1:19:32	1:20:34 / 1:18:51

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

Checkpoint	Km	Time	Rank	vs median
START	0	0:00	—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer	14.8	31:51	11,682	+3:15
Col de la Croix de Fer	38.5	2:30:17	8,615	+6:02
Pied de Col du Télégraphe	80.1	4:31:36	11,817	+38:48
Col du Télégraphe	92	5:41:10	10,742	+39:12
Pied de Col du Galibier	97.3	6:07:31	10,658	+48:43
Tunnel du Galibier	114.6	7:46:56	9,944	+41:50
Activation Canyon	115	7:47:58	9,045	+44:50
Col du Galibier	115.6	7:54:23	9,432	+45:33
Pied de Col de Sarenne	140.2	9:10:29	9,741	+1h02
Col de Sarenne	161	10:32:16	8,835	+57:09
FINISH	170	10:56:56	9,013	+1h01

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.