Nicolas Sitter
L’Étape du Tour 2026

Bib #6078 · M8 · stade francais

10:02:55
Finish time
6,692 / 12,733
Overall
Where you finished
PoolPlaceOf
Overall6,69212,733
Men6,42512,071
M8214617
What it took
PoolWinnerMedian
Overall5:20:20+4:42:359:55:19+7:36
Men5:20:20+4:42:359:53:09+9:46
M87:06:21+2:56:3410:47:19−44:24

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 10th fastest Aymeric of 22. The quickest one did 6:21:00, the median Aymeric 10:11:34.

See the whole Aymeric ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Club ranking

The only stade francais finisher to be classified.

See the whole stade francais club page →

Among classified finishers from this club only, ties sharing a place. This is not the club classification, which scores each club on its 3 best times.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the M8 median was on Descente du Galibier — 3:18 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

The Galibier descent is the clearest signal in an otherwise tight file. You came in about 3 minutes slower than the M8 median there, and behind the overall field median as well. You crossed the line 6692th out of 12733 finishers, riding as part of the M8 field. It wasn't all one-way traffic — the Galibier climb netted you about 13 minutes on the median. Spend time drilling technical descending on similar gradients to the Galibier descent; confidence there is what's costing you.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00
Croix de FerTélégrapheGalibierSarenneFinishkm 0km 170ADC
Aymeric DE CARDES0 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Aymeric DE CARDES moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

overall rank along the course (up = better)

Climbs & segments

SegmentTimeRank
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley29:328,697
Col de la Croix de FerClimb1:58:017,920
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley1:29:017,258
Col du TélégrapheClimb1:08:016,584
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley13:176,554
Col du GalibierClimb1:54:156,052
Descente du GalibierDescent1:02:458,373
Col de SarenneClimb1:26:266,796
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent21:376,151
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined5:00:176,397
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined1:24:227,569

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

SegmentYouStage winner
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer29:32Hugo VALADIER 20:51
Col de la Croix de Fer1:58:01Simon COMBES 1:05:13
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne1:29:01Antoine BERGER 52:00
Col du Télégraphe1:08:01Luca CAVALLO 33:04
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)13:17Robin BOURDIER 7:46
Col du Galibier1:54:15Luca CAVALLO 50:25
Descente du Galibier1:02:45Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38
Col de Sarenne1:26:26Luca CAVALLO 39:52
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez21:37Gustave BRUYER 3:39
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)5:00:17Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)1:24:22Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

CheckpointTimeRank
START0:00—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer29:328,515
Col de la Croix de Fer2:27:337,829
Pied de Col du Télégraphe3:56:347,412
Col du Télégraphe5:04:357,137
Pied de Col du Galibier5:17:526,614
Tunnel du Galibier7:04:337,132
Activation Canyon7:05:376,516
Col du Galibier7:12:076,779
Pied de Col de Sarenne8:14:526,816
Col de Sarenne9:41:186,557
FINISH10:02:556,692

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

7 races on this site

6 finishes across 2 events, matched by name.

L'Étape du Tour6 times
2019L'Étape du Tour 2019 — Albertville → Val ThorensM69:17:43#6,899
2022L'Étape du Tour 2022 — Briançon → Alpe d'HuezM79:48:59#4,553
2023L'Étape du Tour 2023 — Annemasse → MorzineM69:36:20#8,647
2024L'Étape du Tour 2024 — Nice → Col de la CouilloleM77:42:41#3,235
2025L'Étape du Tour de France 2025M78:00:54#6,174
2026L’Étape du Tour de France — this pageM810:02:55#6,692
Triathlon de l'Alpe d'Huez1 time
2023Triathlon de l'Alpe d'Huez 2023 — Triathlon LM55-59start

These are rows sharing the same first and last name. A name is only shown as one career when no single race ever contained two people with it — which rules out the names that are provably shared, but cannot rule out two strangers who never lined up together. If one of these is not you, the removal link at the foot of this page applies to it too.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.