Bib #4952 · M5 · etoile cycliste de clermont ferrand

Jerome COMMUNAL

11:59:48

Finish time

11,615 / 12,733

Overall

Where you finished

Pool	Place	Of
Overall	11,615	12,733
Men	11,037	12,071
M5	1,144	1,255

What it took

Pool	Winner	Median
Overall	5:20:20+6:39:28	9:55:19+2:04:29
Men	5:20:20+6:39:28	9:53:09+2:06:39
M5	6:04:50+5:54:58	10:12:13+1:47:35

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 79th fastest Jerome of 87. The quickest one did 7:00:47, the median Jerome 9:44:55.

See the whole Jerome ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Club ranking

The only etoile cycliste de clermont ferrand finisher to be classified.

See the whole etoile cycliste de clermont ferrand club page →

Among classified finishers from this club only, ties sharing a place. This is not the club classification, which scores each club on its 3 best times.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the M5 median was on Col de Sarenne — 34:14 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

This was a difficult day nearly everywhere: the Col de Sarenne alone cost over 34 minutes against the M5 median, the largest single gap in your data, and the Col du Galibier wasn't far behind at close to 33 minutes lost. The descents didn't offer relief either — both the Galibier drop and the run into Alpe d'Huez were well over 30 minutes off the category median, pushing the combined descenders' time to over 37 minutes back. Even the flatter sections leaked smaller amounts of time throughout. Finishing 11,615th out of 12,733, the scale of the losses on Sarenne and the descents suggests this may have been more about the day than any single technical fix — but if there's one place to start, it's pacing into that final climb.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Race position along the course

Climbs & segments

Segment	Time	Rank	Top %	vs median
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley	26:48	4,718	33%	−1:48
Col de la Croix de FerClimb	1:54:29	6,779	48%	−1:04
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley	1:30:36	7,685	55%	+2:41
Col du TélégrapheClimb	1:18:15	10,257	74%	+9:28
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley	17:22	9,903	73%	+3:56
Col du GalibierClimb	2:32:06	11,584	92%	+36:41
Descente du GalibierDescent	1:29:33	12,374	99%	+32:26
Col de SarenneClimb	2:02:09	12,185	97%	+37:29
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent	28:30	11,704	93%	+6:49
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined	5:44:50	10,265	82%	+46:00
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined	1:58:03	12,165	99%	+38:31

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

Segment	You	Stage winner	M5 leader	GC avg / median	M5 avg / median
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer	26:48	Hugo VALADIER 20:51	Steve BULOT 20:53	28:36 / 28:36	29:01 / 28:54
Col de la Croix de Fer	1:54:29	Simon COMBES 1:05:13	Steve BULOT 1:13:55	1:55:29 / 1:55:33	1:58:03 / 1:57:38
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne	1:30:36	Antoine BERGER 52:00	Antoine MAISONHAUTE 57:35	1:28:54 / 1:27:55	1:30:51 / 1:30:08
Col du Télégraphe	1:18:15	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	Antoine MAISONHAUTE 38:08	1:10:11 / 1:08:47	1:12:10 / 1:10:46
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)	17:22	Robin BOURDIER 7:46	Antoine MAISONHAUTE 7:59	15:48 / 13:26	16:30 / 14:08
Col du Galibier	2:32:06	Luca CAVALLO 50:25	Antoine MAISONHAUTE 57:02	1:56:29 / 1:55:25	2:00:05 / 1:58:52
Descente du Galibier	1:29:33	Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38	Steve BULOT 37:52	58:21 / 57:07	59:03 / 58:10
Col de Sarenne	2:02:09	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	Flip JANSEN 53:18	1:26:19 / 1:24:40	1:29:22 / 1:27:55
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez	28:30	Gustave BRUYER 3:39	?ukasz PODOLSKI 11:10	22:12 / 21:41	22:41 / 22:16
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)	5:44:50	Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49	Antoine MAISONHAUTE 2:49:13	4:57:35 / 4:58:50	5:05:39 / 5:07:12
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)	1:58:03	Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15	Lionel POLETTI 52:42	1:20:41 / 1:19:32	1:21:39 / 1:20:37

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

Checkpoint	Km	Time	Rank	vs median
START	0	0:00	—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer	14.8	26:48	4,660	−1:48
Col de la Croix de Fer	38.5	2:21:17	6,263	−2:58
Pied de Col du Télégraphe	80.1	3:51:53	6,783	−0:55
Col du Télégraphe	92	5:10:08	7,691	+8:10
Pied de Col du Galibier	97.3	5:27:30	7,449	+8:42
Tunnel du Galibier	114.6	7:48:49	10,071	+43:43
Activation Canyon	115	7:50:14	9,170	+47:06
Col du Galibier	115.6	7:59:36	9,765	+50:46
Pied de Col de Sarenne	140.2	9:29:09	10,736	+1h21
Col de Sarenne	161	11:31:18	11,342	+1h56
FINISH	170	11:59:48	11,615	+2h04

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.