Bib #449 · M1 · Team FCT

Pierre PATOIS

7:10:20

Finish time

685 / 12,733

Overall

Where you finished

Pool	Place	Of
Overall	685	12,733
Men	675	12,071
M1	340	2,488

What it took

Pool	Winner	Median
Overall	5:20:20+1:50:00	9:55:19−2:44:59
Men	5:20:20+1:50:00	9:53:09−2:42:49
M1	5:20:20+1:50:00	9:06:24−1:56:04

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 9th fastest Pierre of 144. The quickest one did 6:22:41, the median Pierre 9:36:18.

See the whole Pierre ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Club ranking

The only Team FCT finisher to be classified.

See the whole Team FCT club page →

Among classified finishers from this club only, ties sharing a place. This is not the club classification, which scores each club on its 3 best times.

Also rode L'Étape du Tour Femmes 2026name match

4:21:33 · 501st overall

One of the 1,586 riders who entered both Étapes this year — see the doublé analysis.

Strong across the board: you beat the M1 median on every climb and descent — closest margin on Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez.

Your AI ride analysis

In the M1 category, out of 12,733 total riders on the stage, you crossed the line 685th. The individual climbs and descents, measured against the M1 median, explain that result far better than the overall time alone. The biggest positive swing was on the Col de la Croix de Fer - just over 24 minutes faster than the M1 median. What stands out most: there wasn't a single segment where the M1 median beat you, including the Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez, your tightest margin. With every segment already in your favor, treat the Col de la Croix de Fer as the blueprint for how you want to ride the rest of your season.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Race position along the course

Climbs & segments

Segment	Time	Rank	Top %	vs median
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley	21:26	275	2%	−7:10
Col de la Croix de FerClimb	1:22:11	477	3%	−33:22
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley	1:02:09	703	5%	−25:46
Col du TélégrapheClimb	46:47	481	3%	−22:00
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley	9:10	616	5%	−4:16
Col du GalibierClimb	1:23:03	978	8%	−32:22
Descente du GalibierDescent	44:30	1,461	12%	−12:37
Col de SarenneClimb	1:03:36	900	7%	−21:04
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent	17:28	1,487	12%	−4:13
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined	3:32:01	577	5%	−1:26:49
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined	1:01:58	1,257	10%	−17:34

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

Segment	You	Stage winner	M1 leader	GC avg / median	M1 avg / median
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer	21:26	Hugo VALADIER 20:51	Hugo VALADIER 20:51	28:36 / 28:36	27:14 / 27:10
Col de la Croix de Fer	1:22:11	Simon COMBES 1:05:13	Simon COMBES 1:05:13	1:55:29 / 1:55:33	1:46:44 / 1:46:38
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne	1:02:09	Antoine BERGER 52:00	Antoine BERGER 52:00	1:28:54 / 1:27:55	1:23:07 / 1:20:20
Col du Télégraphe	46:47	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	1:10:11 / 1:08:47	1:04:08 / 1:02:33
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)	9:10	Robin BOURDIER 7:46	Robin BOURDIER 7:46	15:48 / 13:26	14:07 / 11:51
Col du Galibier	1:23:03	Luca CAVALLO 50:25	Luca CAVALLO 50:25	1:56:29 / 1:55:25	1:47:53 / 1:45:01
Descente du Galibier	44:30	Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38	Simon GUGLIELMI 34:51	58:21 / 57:07	55:37 / 53:30
Col de Sarenne	1:03:36	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	1:26:19 / 1:24:40	1:19:46 / 1:17:32
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez	17:28	Gustave BRUYER 3:39	Gustave BRUYER 3:39	22:12 / 21:41	20:48 / 20:05
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)	3:32:01	Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49	Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49	4:57:35 / 4:58:50	4:36:48 / 4:34:46
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)	1:01:58	Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15	Luca CAVALLO 49:17	1:20:41 / 1:19:32	1:16:59 / 1:14:49

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

Checkpoint	Km	Time	Rank	vs median
START	0	0:00	—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer	14.8	21:26	273	−7:10
Col de la Croix de Fer	38.5	1:43:37	414	−40:38
Pied de Col du Télégraphe	80.1	2:45:46	456	−1:07:02
Col du Télégraphe	92	3:32:33	441	−1:29:25
Pied de Col du Galibier	97.3	3:41:43	434	−1:37:05
Tunnel du Galibier	114.6	4:56:27	529	−2:08:39
Activation Canyon	115	4:57:21	505	−2:05:47
Col du Galibier	115.6	5:04:46	571	−2:04:04
Pied de Col de Sarenne	140.2	5:49:16	597	−2:18:48
Col de Sarenne	161	6:52:52	522	−2:42:15
FINISH	170	7:10:20	685	−2:45:00

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.