Nicolas Sitter
L’Étape du Tour 2026

Bib #3806 · M4 · Cc Montois

11:35:00
Finish time
10,662 / 12,733
Overall
Where you finished
PoolPlaceOf
Overall10,66212,733
Men10,14512,071
M41,2361,439
What it took
PoolWinnerMedian
Overall5:20:20+6:14:409:55:19+1:39:41
Men5:20:20+6:14:409:53:09+1:41:51
M45:55:40+5:39:209:53:35+1:41:25

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 62nd fastest Cédric of 72 (all spellings of Cédric, including Cedric). The quickest one did 6:11:45, the median Cédric 9:26:46.

See the whole Cédric ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Club ranking

The only Cc Montois finisher to be classified.

See the whole Cc Montois club page →

Among classified finishers from this club only, ties sharing a place. This is not the club classification, which scores each club on its 3 best times.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the M4 median was on Col de Sarenne — 54:29 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

The Col de Sarenne was catastrophic for your day against your M4 category, close to 54 and a half minutes behind median and by far the biggest gap on the course. The Col du Galibier also cost over 50 minutes, so together those two climbs account for the bulk of your deficit. The rest of the stage, including the Croix de Fer and Maurienne valley, stayed much closer to median. Given how concentrated the losses are on those two specific climbs, checking whether something specific happened there — cramping, a mechanical, or simply running out of fuel — is worth doing before assuming it's a broad fitness gap.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00
Croix de FerTélégrapheGalibierSarenneFinishkm 0km 170CC
Cedric CHANSON0 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Cedric CHANSON moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

overall rank along the course (up = better)

Climbs & segments

SegmentTimeRank
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley25:042,879
Col de la Croix de FerClimb1:54:536,910
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley1:20:345,035
Col du TélégrapheClimb1:15:269,398
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley12:115,082
Col du GalibierClimb2:44:3412,165
Descente du GalibierDescent59:037,003
Col de SarenneClimb2:18:3412,437
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent24:419,429
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined5:54:5310,885
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined1:23:447,376

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

SegmentYouStage winner
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer25:04Hugo VALADIER 20:51
Col de la Croix de Fer1:54:53Simon COMBES 1:05:13
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne1:20:34Antoine BERGER 52:00
Col du Télégraphe1:15:26Luca CAVALLO 33:04
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)12:11Robin BOURDIER 7:46
Col du Galibier2:44:34Luca CAVALLO 50:25
Descente du Galibier59:03Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38
Col de Sarenne2:18:34Luca CAVALLO 39:52
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez24:41Gustave BRUYER 3:39
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)5:54:53Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)1:23:44Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

CheckpointTimeRank
START0:00—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer25:042,854
Col de la Croix de Fer2:19:575,948
Pied de Col du Télégraphe3:40:315,354
Col du Télégraphe4:55:576,284
Pied de Col du Galibier5:08:085,811
Tunnel du Galibier7:43:349,722
Activation Canyon7:44:538,864
Col du Galibier7:52:429,338
Pied de Col de Sarenne8:51:458,752
Col de Sarenne11:10:1910,515
FINISH11:35:0010,662

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

5 races on this site

5 finishes across 1 event, matched by name.

L'Étape du Tour5 times
2014L'Étape du Tour 2014 — Pau → Hautacam7:20:24#1,850
2016L'Étape du Tour 2016 — Megève → MorzineM1-H5:07:20#1,551
2019L'Étape du Tour 2019 — Albertville → Val ThorensM37:08:54#2,133
2024L'Étape du Tour 2024 — Nice → Col de la CouilloleM48:17:39#4,678
2026L’Étape du Tour de France — this pageM411:35:00#10,662

These are rows sharing the same first and last name. A name is only shown as one career when no single race ever contained two people with it — which rules out the names that are provably shared, but cannot rule out two strangers who never lined up together. If one of these is not you, the removal link at the foot of this page applies to it too.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.