Nicolas Sitter
L’Étape du Tour 2026

Bib #3301 · M6 · CCRG

9:09:33
Finish time
4,367 / 12,733
Overall
Where you finished
PoolPlaceOf
Overall4,36712,733
Men4,22912,071
M63661,348
What it took
PoolWinnerMedian
Overall5:20:20+3:49:139:55:19−45:46
Men5:20:20+3:49:139:53:09−43:36
M66:10:15+2:59:1810:16:28−1:06:55

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 20th fastest Cyril of 48. The quickest one did 7:33:59, the median Cyril 9:25:04.

See the whole Cyril ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Club ranking

1st of 2 from CCRG. Its quickest did 9:09:33, its median 10:04:44.

See the whole CCRG club page →

Among classified finishers from this club only, ties sharing a place. This is not the club classification, which scores each club on its 3 best times.

Strong across the board: you beat the M6 median on every climb and descent — closest margin on Col du Galibier.

Your AI ride analysis

General classification puts you at 4,367th out of 12,733, inside the M6 category. The individual climbs and descents, measured against the M6 median, explain that result far better than the overall time alone. Nowhere did you gain more than on the Descente + vallée de la Maurienne, just over 22 minutes clear of the M6 median. Nothing in the M6 comparison drags you down - you were even with or better than the median on every segment, the Col du Galibier included. There's nothing to patch up here - lean further into whatever you're doing well on climbs like the Descente + vallée de la Maurienne and keep it up.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00
Croix de FerTélégrapheGalibierSarenneFinishkm 0km 170CP
Cyril PECOURT0 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Cyril PECOURT moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

overall rank along the course (up = better)

Climbs & segments

SegmentTimeRank
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley25:113,001
Col de la Croix de FerClimb1:45:134,077
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley1:07:351,826
Col du TélégrapheClimb1:08:306,781
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley10:563,108
Col du GalibierClimb1:57:556,743
Descente du GalibierDescent52:064,325
Col de SarenneClimb1:22:175,517
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent19:503,948
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined4:51:385,539
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined1:11:563,914

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

SegmentYouStage winner
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer25:11Hugo VALADIER 20:51
Col de la Croix de Fer1:45:13Simon COMBES 1:05:13
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne1:07:35Antoine BERGER 52:00
Col du Télégraphe1:08:30Luca CAVALLO 33:04
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)10:56Robin BOURDIER 7:46
Col du Galibier1:57:55Luca CAVALLO 50:25
Descente du Galibier52:06Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38
Col de Sarenne1:22:17Luca CAVALLO 39:52
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez19:50Gustave BRUYER 3:39
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)4:51:38Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)1:11:56Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

CheckpointTimeRank
START0:00—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer25:112,978
Col de la Croix de Fer2:10:243,729
Pied de Col du Télégraphe3:17:592,784
Col du Télégraphe4:26:293,534
Pied de Col du Galibier4:37:253,230
Tunnel du Galibier6:25:554,515
Activation Canyon6:27:174,192
Col du Galibier6:35:204,469
Pied de Col de Sarenne7:27:264,322
Col de Sarenne8:49:434,225
FINISH9:09:334,367

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

6 races on this site

6 finishes across 1 event, matched by name.

L'Étape du Tour6 times
2017L'Étape du Tour 2017 — Briançon → Col d'IzoardM410:53:22#8,244
2022L'Étape du Tour 2022 — Briançon → Alpe d'HuezM58:52:54#2,834
2023L'Étape du Tour 2023 — Annemasse → MorzineM47:13:05#2,836
2024L'Étape du Tour 2024 — Nice → Col de la CouilloleM57:45:14#3,332
2025L'Étape du Tour de France 2025M67:14:11#3,763
2026L’Étape du Tour de France — this pageM69:09:33#4,367

These are rows sharing the same first and last name. A name is only shown as one career when no single race ever contained two people with it — which rules out the names that are provably shared, but cannot rule out two strangers who never lined up together. If one of these is not you, the removal link at the foot of this page applies to it too.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.