Quentin LOUIS

7:46:18

Finish time

1,461 / 12,733

Overall

Where you finished

Pool	Place	Of
Overall	1,461	12,733
Men	1,431	12,071
M1	588	2,488

What it took

Pool	Winner	Median
Overall	5:20:20+2:25:58	9:55:19−2:09:01
Men	5:20:20+2:25:58	9:53:09−2:06:51
M1	5:20:20+2:25:58	9:06:24−1:20:06

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 18th fastest Quentin of 96. The quickest one did 5:57:06, the median Quentin 9:00:08.

See the whole Quentin ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Club ranking

The only UCGUIPAVASIENNE finisher to be classified.

See the whole UCGUIPAVASIENNE club page →

Among classified finishers from this club only, ties sharing a place. This is not the club classification, which scores each club on its 3 best times.

Also rode L'Étape du Tour Femmes 2026name match

5:06:41 · 1,623rd overall

One of the 1,586 riders who entered both Étapes this year — see the doublé analysis.

Strong across the board: you beat the M1 median on every climb and descent — closest margin on Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire).

Your AI ride analysis

Your splits are remarkably consistent: not one segment fell behind the M1 median. Your biggest margin came on the Descente + vallée de la Maurienne, where you beat the M1 median by about 15 minutes (about 65 minutes against about 80 minutes). Even your tightest margin, on the Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire), still had you about 2 minutes inside the M1 median. Overall that was 1461st of 12733 finishers, squarely in the top quarter. Your best asset here is the Descente + vallée de la Maurienne, where the gap over the median was largest — a strength worth leaning on in future races.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Race position along the course

Climbs & segments

Segment	Time	Rank	Top %	vs median
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley	24:14	2,033	14%	−4:22
Col de la Croix de FerClimb	1:38:36	2,564	18%	−16:57
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley	1:05:26	1,326	10%	−22:29
Col du TélégrapheClimb	53:42	1,597	12%	−15:05
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley	9:42	1,170	9%	−3:44
Col du GalibierClimb	1:31:46	1,983	16%	−23:39
Descente du GalibierDescent	43:04	1,031	8%	−14:03
Col de SarenneClimb	1:03:21	862	7%	−21:19
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent	16:27	752	6%	−5:14
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined	4:04:04	1,839	15%	−54:46
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined	59:31	736	6%	−20:01

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

Segment	You	Stage winner	M1 leader	GC avg / median	M1 avg / median
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer	24:14	Hugo VALADIER 20:51	Hugo VALADIER 20:51	28:36 / 28:36	27:14 / 27:10
Col de la Croix de Fer	1:38:36	Simon COMBES 1:05:13	Simon COMBES 1:05:13	1:55:29 / 1:55:33	1:46:44 / 1:46:38
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne	1:05:26	Antoine BERGER 52:00	Antoine BERGER 52:00	1:28:54 / 1:27:55	1:23:07 / 1:20:20
Col du Télégraphe	53:42	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	1:10:11 / 1:08:47	1:04:08 / 1:02:33
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)	9:42	Robin BOURDIER 7:46	Robin BOURDIER 7:46	15:48 / 13:26	14:07 / 11:51
Col du Galibier	1:31:46	Luca CAVALLO 50:25	Luca CAVALLO 50:25	1:56:29 / 1:55:25	1:47:53 / 1:45:01
Descente du Galibier	43:04	Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38	Simon GUGLIELMI 34:51	58:21 / 57:07	55:37 / 53:30
Col de Sarenne	1:03:21	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	1:26:19 / 1:24:40	1:19:46 / 1:17:32
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez	16:27	Gustave BRUYER 3:39	Gustave BRUYER 3:39	22:12 / 21:41	20:48 / 20:05
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)	4:04:04	Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49	Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49	4:57:35 / 4:58:50	4:36:48 / 4:34:46
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)	59:31	Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15	Luca CAVALLO 49:17	1:20:41 / 1:19:32	1:16:59 / 1:14:49

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

Checkpoint	Km	Time	Rank	vs median
START	0	0:00	—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer	14.8	24:14	2,012	−4:22
Col de la Croix de Fer	38.5	2:02:50	2,378	−21:25
Pied de Col du Télégraphe	80.1	3:08:16	1,870	−44:32
Col du Télégraphe	92	4:01:58	1,737	−1:00:00
Pied de Col du Galibier	97.3	4:11:40	1,527	−1:07:08
Tunnel du Galibier	114.6	5:37:37	1,823	−1:27:29
Activation Canyon	115	5:38:26	1,743	−1:24:42
Col du Galibier	115.6	5:43:26	1,773	−1:25:24
Pied de Col de Sarenne	140.2	6:26:30	1,646	−1:41:34
Col de Sarenne	161	7:29:51	1,339	−2:05:16
FINISH	170	7:46:18	1,461	−2:09:02

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.