Nicolas Sitter
L’Étape du Tour 2026

Bib #2532 · M2

8:25:50
Finish time
2,679 / 12,733
Overall
Where you finished
PoolPlaceOf
Overall2,67912,733
Men2,61612,071
M24721,853
What it took
PoolWinnerMedian
Overall5:20:20+3:05:309:55:19−1:29:29
Men5:20:20+3:05:309:53:09−1:27:19
M25:24:31+3:01:199:38:50−1:13:00

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 74th fastest Thomas of 260. The quickest one did 5:35:59, the median Thomas 9:37:37.

See the whole Thomas ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the M2 median was on Descente du Galibier — 2:22 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

You beat the bulk of category M2 home, finishing 2679th out of 12733 on the day. Nowhere did you look better than on Col de la Croix de Fer, where you found about 17 minutes on the M2 median. The data points squarely at Descente du Galibier as the weak link, about 2 minutes off the M2 median. Spending a few sessions on descending lines and braking points would directly address the time lost on Descente du Galibier.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00
Croix de FerTélégrapheGalibierSarenneFinishkm 0km 170TS
Thomas SACLIER0 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Thomas SACLIER moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

overall rank along the course (up = better)

Climbs & segments

SegmentTimeRank
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley25:163,071
Col de la Croix de FerClimb1:34:311,797
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley1:13:233,184
Col du TélégrapheClimb56:012,231
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley12:255,393
Col du GalibierClimb1:36:272,668
Descente du GalibierDescent59:127,073
Col de SarenneClimb1:09:201,928
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent19:153,237
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined4:06:591,994
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined1:18:275,849

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

SegmentYouStage winner
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer25:16Hugo VALADIER 20:51
Col de la Croix de Fer1:34:31Simon COMBES 1:05:13
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne1:13:23Antoine BERGER 52:00
Col du Télégraphe56:01Luca CAVALLO 33:04
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)12:25Robin BOURDIER 7:46
Col du Galibier1:36:27Luca CAVALLO 50:25
Descente du Galibier59:12Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38
Col de Sarenne1:09:20Luca CAVALLO 39:52
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez19:15Gustave BRUYER 3:39
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)4:06:59Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)1:18:27Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

CheckpointTimeRank
START0:00—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer25:163,046
Col de la Croix de Fer1:59:471,906
Pied de Col du Télégraphe3:13:102,313
Col du Télégraphe4:09:112,234
Pied de Col du Galibier4:21:362,100
Tunnel du Galibier5:51:262,500
Activation Canyon5:52:262,353
Col du Galibier5:58:032,426
Pied de Col de Sarenne6:57:152,874
Col de Sarenne8:06:352,514
FINISH8:25:502,679

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

17 races on this site

17 finishes across 6 events, matched by name.

Semi de Paris9 times
2015Semi de Paris 2015JUH2:24:19#12,215
2017Semi de Paris 2017ESH1:50:12#4,949
2018Semi de Paris 2018ESH1:37:49#2,257
2019Semi de Paris 2019SEH1:40:20#4,851
2021Semi de Paris 2021SEH1:29:04#801
2023Semi de Paris 2023SEH1:22:21#1,099
2024Semi de Paris 2024SEH1:18:18#551
2025Semi de Paris 2025SEH1:17:33#421
2026HOKA Semi de Paris 2026SH1:22:02#1,274
Marathon de Paris3 times
2017Marathon de Paris 2017ESH4:03:16#9,221
2021Marathon de Paris 2021SEH3:23:31#3,489
2026Schneider Electric Marathon de Paris 2026SH3:44:20#15,750
20 km de Paris2 times
202320 km de ParisSH1:17:28#543
202520Km de ParisSH1:17:36#891
Triathlon de l'Alpe d'Huez1 time
2015Triathlon de l'Alpe d'Huez 2015 — Triathlon MMJU2:42:50#479
L'Étape du Tour1 time
2026L’Étape du Tour de France — this pageM28:25:50#2,679
adidas 10K Paris1 time
2021adidas 10K Paris 2021SEH37:55#247

These are rows sharing the same first and last name. A name is only shown as one career when no single race ever contained two people with it — which rules out the names that are provably shared, but cannot rule out two strangers who never lined up together. If one of these is not you, the removal link at the foot of this page applies to it too.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.