Bib #2073 · M1 · Union cycliste Culoz Belley
Romain FATIGUET
Compare with other riders| Pool | Place | Of |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1,066 | 12,733 |
| Men | 1,047 | 12,071 |
| M1 | 477 | 2,488 |
| Pool | Winner | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5:20:20+2:10:31 | 9:55:19−2:24:28 |
| Men | 5:20:20+2:10:31 | 9:53:09−2:22:18 |
| M1 | 5:20:20+2:10:31 | 9:06:24−1:35:33 |
Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.
The fun ranking
The 21st fastest Romain of 131. The quickest one did 6:08:58, the median Romain 9:14:58.
See the whole Romain ranking →Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.
Club ranking
The only Union cycliste Culoz Belley finisher to be classified.
See the whole Union cycliste Culoz Belley club page →Among classified finishers from this club only, ties sharing a place. This is not the club classification, which scores each club on its 3 best times.
Your AI ride analysis
Digging into your segment times in M1, you climb better relative to your M1 peers than you handle descents or flat sections. Your best number of the day was on Col de la Croix de Fer: about 18 minutes faster than the M1 median. Every measured split came in ahead of the M1 median; nothing in this data qualifies as a weakness. The closest call was Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire), where your edge over the M1 median narrowed to about 2.5 minutes — still a gain. With a day this clean, the next step isn't fixing weaknesses but leaning further into your climbing legs on an even tougher route.
Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.
Watch the ride 🎬
Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.
Romain FATIGUET moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.
Race position along the course
Climbs & segments
| Segment | Time | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley | 24:10 | 1,925 |
| Col de la Croix de FerClimb | 1:28:19 | 971 |
| Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley | 1:06:36 | 1,585 |
| Col du TélégrapheClimb | 49:31 | 803 |
| Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley | 9:26 | 872 |
| Col du GalibierClimb | 1:28:20 | 1,544 |
| Descente du GalibierDescent | 44:37 | 1,505 |
| Col de SarenneClimb | 1:03:30 | 884 |
| Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent | 16:22 | 706 |
| Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined | 3:46:10 | 1,029 |
| Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined | 1:00:59 | 1,020 |
“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.
How you compare, climb by climb
| Segment | You | Stage winner |
|---|---|---|
| Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer | 24:10 | Hugo VALADIER 20:51 |
| Col de la Croix de Fer | 1:28:19 | Simon COMBES 1:05:13 |
| Descente + vallée de la Maurienne | 1:06:36 | Antoine BERGER 52:00 |
| Col du Télégraphe | 49:31 | Luca CAVALLO 33:04 |
| Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire) | 9:26 | Robin BOURDIER 7:46 |
| Col du Galibier | 1:28:20 | Luca CAVALLO 50:25 |
| Descente du Galibier | 44:37 | Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38 |
| Col de Sarenne | 1:03:30 | Luca CAVALLO 39:52 |
| Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez | 16:22 | Gustave BRUYER 3:39 |
| Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier) | 3:46:10 | Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49 |
| Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées) | 1:00:59 | Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15 |
“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.
Checkpoint splits
| Checkpoint | Time | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| START | 0:00 | — |
| Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer | 24:10 | 1,913 |
| Col de la Croix de Fer | 1:52:29 | 1,040 |
| Pied de Col du Télégraphe | 2:59:05 | 1,182 |
| Col du Télégraphe | 3:48:36 | 1,018 |
| Pied de Col du Galibier | 3:58:02 | 952 |
| Tunnel du Galibier | 5:20:18 | 1,155 |
| Activation Canyon | 5:21:12 | 1,106 |
| Col du Galibier | 5:26:22 | 1,140 |
| Pied de Col de Sarenne | 6:10:59 | 1,144 |
| Col de Sarenne | 7:14:29 | 925 |
| FINISH | 7:30:51 | 1,066 |
Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.
3 races on this site
3 finishes across 1 event, matched by name.
| 2024 | L'Étape du Tour 2024 — Nice → Col de la CouilloleM1 | 7:12:16 | #2,115 |
| 2025 | L'Étape du Tour de France 2025M1 | 6:38:54 | #2,170 |
| 2026 | L’Étape du Tour de France — this pageM1 | 7:30:51 | #1,066 |
These are rows sharing the same first and last name. A name is only shown as one career when no single race ever contained two people with it — which rules out the names that are provably shared, but cannot rule out two strangers who never lined up together. If one of these is not you, the removal link at the foot of this page applies to it too.
Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.
Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.
One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.