Bib #15792 · M4

Anthony FARGEOT

10:25:13

Finish time

7,677 / 12,733

Overall

Where you finished

Pool	Place	Of
Overall	7,677	12,733
Men	7,349	12,071
M4	913	1,439

What it took

Pool	Winner	Median
Overall	5:20:20+5:04:53	9:55:19+29:54
Men	5:20:20+5:04:53	9:53:09+32:04
M4	5:55:40+4:29:33	9:53:35+31:38

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 42nd fastest Anthony of 68. The quickest one did 6:35:45, the median Anthony 9:49:02.

See the whole Anthony ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the M4 median was on Col du Télégraphe — 14:53 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

Placing 7677th of 12733 in M4, your descending stood out more than anything else in your M4 splits. Descente du Galibier is where the ride turned in your favor, about 8 minutes up on the M4 median. The clearest opportunity in your data sits on Col du Télégraphe, where you gave up about 15 minutes to the M4 median. The fix is fairly specific: a few dedicated climbing-repeat sessions, aimed at climbs shaped like Col du Télégraphe.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00

Anthony FARGEOT0 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Anthony FARGEOT moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

Climbs & segments

Segment	Time	Rank	Top %	vs median
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley	29:40	8,902	62%	+1:04
Col de la Croix de FerClimb	2:09:17	11,184	78%	+13:44
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley	1:23:14	5,756	41%	−4:41
Col du TélégrapheClimb	1:23:02	11,382	82%	+14:15
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley	11:32	4,128	31%	−1:54
Col du GalibierClimb	2:04:36	8,046	64%	+9:11
Descente du GalibierDescent	48:55	3,087	25%	−8:12
Col de SarenneClimb	1:26:56	6,937	55%	+2:16
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent	28:01	11,517	92%	+6:20
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined	5:36:55	9,653	77%	+38:05
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined	1:16:56	5,380	44%	−2:36

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

Segment	You	Stage winner	M4 leader	GC avg / median	M4 avg / median
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer	29:40	Hugo VALADIER 20:51	Sebastian DRUSZKIEWICZ 20:54	28:36 / 28:36	28:32 / 28:46
Col de la Croix de Fer	2:09:17	Simon COMBES 1:05:13	Sebastian DRUSZKIEWICZ 1:07:54	1:55:29 / 1:55:33	1:55:24 / 1:54:50
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne	1:23:14	Antoine BERGER 52:00	Alexandre BANEGAS 56:28	1:28:54 / 1:27:55	1:28:40 / 1:26:52
Col du Télégraphe	1:23:02	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	Alexandre BANEGAS 38:57	1:10:11 / 1:08:47	1:09:43 / 1:08:09
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)	11:32	Robin BOURDIER 7:46	Alexandre BANEGAS 7:59	15:48 / 13:26	15:41 / 13:28
Col du Galibier	2:04:36	Luca CAVALLO 50:25	Jonathan LEMAITRE 1:00:24	1:56:29 / 1:55:25	1:56:02 / 1:53:56
Descente du Galibier	48:55	Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38	Alexandre BANEGAS 37:18	58:21 / 57:07	58:24 / 56:50
Col de Sarenne	1:26:56	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	Naoto SAITA 50:07	1:26:19 / 1:24:40	1:26:23 / 1:24:05
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez	28:01	Gustave BRUYER 3:39	Baptiste COUSTET 14:19	22:12 / 21:41	22:08 / 21:39
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)	5:36:55	Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49	Alexandre BANEGAS 2:50:13	4:57:35 / 4:58:50	4:56:45 / 4:56:26
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)	1:16:56	Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15	Baptiste COUSTET 52:33	1:20:41 / 1:19:32	1:20:34 / 1:18:51

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

Checkpoint	Km	Time	Rank	vs median
START	0	0:00	—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer	14.8	29:40	8,726	+1:04
Col de la Croix de Fer	38.5	2:38:57	10,682	+14:42
Pied de Col du Télégraphe	80.1	4:02:11	8,133	+9:23
Col du Télégraphe	92	5:25:13	9,217	+23:15
Pied de Col du Galibier	97.3	5:36:45	8,279	+17:57
Tunnel du Galibier	114.6	7:32:35	9,001	+27:29
Activation Canyon	115	7:33:57	8,217	+30:49
Col du Galibier	115.6	7:41:21	8,612	+32:31
Pied de Col de Sarenne	140.2	8:30:16	7,611	+22:12
Col de Sarenne	161	9:57:12	7,275	+22:05
FINISH	170	10:25:13	7,677	+29:53

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.