| Pool | Place | Of |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 9,450 | 12,733 |
| Women | 448 | 662 |
| W3 | 81 | 115 |
| Pool | Winner | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5:20:20+5:46:33 | 9:55:19+1:11:34 |
| Women | 6:19:12+4:47:41 | 10:26:42+40:11 |
| W3 | 6:22:31+4:44:22 | 10:18:16+48:37 |
Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.
The fun ranking
The 5th fastest Charlotte of 10. The quickest one did 9:17:43, the median Charlotte 11:08:51.
See the whole Charlotte ranking →Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.
Your AI ride analysis
Out of 12733 finishers in W3, you placed 9450th, and the segment data points to a single recoverable gap. The real damage came on Col du Galibier, where you lost about 11 minutes 33 seconds to the W3 median. Compare that to Col de Sarenne, where you ran about 2 minutes 28 seconds ahead of the W3 median — clearly your strength. A block of climbing-specific intervals aimed squarely at pacing efforts like Col du Galibier would be the highest-value fix.
Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.
Race position along the course
Climbs & segments
| Segment | Time | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley | 33:42 | 13,483 |
| Col de la Croix de FerClimb | 2:12:05 | 11,845 |
| Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley | 1:35:35 | 8,961 |
| Col du TélégrapheClimb | 1:19:12 | 10,490 |
| Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley | 25:06 | 12,180 |
| Col du GalibierClimb | 2:08:27 | 8,735 |
| Descente du GalibierDescent | 1:03:08 | 8,508 |
| Col de SarenneClimb | 1:25:28 | 6,504 |
| Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent | 24:10 | 8,954 |
| Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined | 5:39:44 | 9,882 |
| Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined | 1:27:18 | 8,416 |
“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.
How you compare, climb by climb
| Segment | You | Stage winner |
|---|---|---|
| Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer | 33:42 | Hugo VALADIER 20:51 |
| Col de la Croix de Fer | 2:12:05 | Simon COMBES 1:05:13 |
| Descente + vallée de la Maurienne | 1:35:35 | Antoine BERGER 52:00 |
| Col du Télégraphe | 1:19:12 | Luca CAVALLO 33:04 |
| Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire) | 25:06 | Robin BOURDIER 7:46 |
| Col du Galibier | 2:08:27 | Luca CAVALLO 50:25 |
| Descente du Galibier | 1:03:08 | Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38 |
| Col de Sarenne | 1:25:28 | Luca CAVALLO 39:52 |
| Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez | 24:10 | Gustave BRUYER 3:39 |
| Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier) | 5:39:44 | Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49 |
| Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées) | 1:27:18 | Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15 |
“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.
Checkpoint splits
| Checkpoint | Time | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| START | 0:00 | — |
| Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer | 33:42 | 13,051 |
| Col de la Croix de Fer | 2:45:47 | 11,965 |
| Pied de Col du Télégraphe | 4:21:22 | 10,646 |
| Col du Télégraphe | 5:40:34 | 10,683 |
| Pied de Col du Galibier | 6:05:40 | 10,534 |
| Tunnel du Galibier | 8:04:46 | 11,108 |
| Activation Canyon | 8:07:31 | 10,174 |
| Col du Galibier | 8:14:07 | 10,652 |
| Pied de Col de Sarenne | 9:17:15 | 10,109 |
| Col de Sarenne | 10:42:43 | 9,313 |
| FINISH | 11:06:53 | 9,450 |
Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.