Bib #13198 · FR · M6 · Limogne Magicreme

Ludovic PUYDEBOIS

12:35:20

Finish time

12,426 / 12,733

Overall

Where you finished

Pool	Place	Of
Overall	12,426	12,733
Men	11,782	12,071
M6	1,298	1,348

What it took

Pool	Winner	Median
Overall	5:20:20+7:15:00	9:55:19+2:40:01
Men	5:20:20+7:15:00	9:53:09+2:42:11
M6	6:10:15+6:25:05	10:16:28+2:18:52

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 56th fastest Ludovic of 57. The quickest one did 5:54:07, the median Ludovic 9:28:00.

See the whole Ludovic ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Club ranking

The only Limogne Magicreme finisher to be classified.

See the whole Limogne Magicreme club page →

Among classified finishers from this club only, ties sharing a place. This is not the club classification, which scores each club on its 3 best times.

Also rode L'Étape du Tour Femmes 2026name match

8:13:39 · 8,743rd overall

One of the 1,586 riders who entered both Étapes this year — see the doublé analysis.

⚠️ This rider’s chip was only read at 10 of the 12 timing mats — segment times that need a missing mat can’t be computed, and this rider is absent from the corresponding leaderboards.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the M6 median was on Col de Sarenne — 43:20 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

You finished 12,426th out of 12,733 in M6, and Col de Sarenne was the costliest segment recorded, about 43 minutes and 20 seconds slower than the M6 median. The Col du Télégraphe added nearly 31 more minutes, and the Col de la Croix de Fer cost over 26 minutes and 55 seconds on top of that. The Descente + vallée de la Maurienne contributed another 17 minutes and 26 seconds as well, leaving almost every climbing segment well off category pace. With losses this large across the board, building sustained climbing endurance — rather than any single technical fix — is the realistic starting point, with Sarenne as the biggest individual target.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Race position along the course

Climbs & segments

Segment	Time	Rank	Top %	vs median
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley	28:38	7,224	50%	+2s
Col de la Croix de FerClimb	2:25:29	13,598	95%	+29:56
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley	1:47:22	11,648	84%	+19:27
Col du TélégrapheClimb	1:42:18	13,379	97%	+33:31
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley	14:57	8,387	62%	+1:31
Col du GalibierClimb	mat missed at Col du Galibier	—	—	—
Descente du GalibierDescent	mat missed at Col du Galibier	—	—	—
Col de SarenneClimb	2:11:54	12,376	99%	+47:14
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent	26:59	11,062	88%	+5:18
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined	incomplete mat data	—	—	—
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined	incomplete mat data	—	—	—

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

Segment	You	Stage winner	M6 leader	GC avg / median	M6 avg / median
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer	28:38	Hugo VALADIER 20:51	Lilian JEGOU 20:53	28:36 / 28:36	28:57 / 28:50
Col de la Croix de Fer	2:25:29	Simon COMBES 1:05:13	Robert ALPEN 1:13:38	1:55:29 / 1:55:33	1:58:44 / 1:58:34
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne	1:47:22	Antoine BERGER 52:00	David GAGNEPAIN 57:47	1:28:54 / 1:27:55	1:30:55 / 1:29:56
Col du Télégraphe	1:42:18	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	Duncan ALEXANDER 40:38	1:10:11 / 1:08:47	1:13:04 / 1:11:19
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)	14:57	Robin BOURDIER 7:46	Nicolas OUGIER 8:07	15:48 / 13:26	16:49 / 14:16
Col de Sarenne	2:11:54	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	Stephan HUMBLET 51:27	1:26:19 / 1:24:40	1:30:09 / 1:28:34
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez	26:59	Gustave BRUYER 3:39	Christophe RAUBER 13:19	22:12 / 21:41	22:47 / 22:30

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

Checkpoint	Km	Time	Rank	vs median
START	0	0:00	—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer	14.8	28:38	7,094	+2s
Col de la Croix de Fer	38.5	2:54:07	12,922	+29:52
Pied de Col du Télégraphe	80.1	4:41:29	12,745	+48:41
Col du Télégraphe	92	6:23:47	13,282	+1h21
Pied de Col du Galibier	97.3	6:38:44	12,384	+1h19
Tunnel du Galibier	114.6	9:03:55	13,660	+1h58
Pied de Col de Sarenne	140.2	9:56:27	12,015	+1h48
Col de Sarenne	161	12:08:21	12,228	+2h33
FINISH	170	12:35:20	12,426	+2h40

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.