| Pool | Place | Of |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 11,408 | 12,733 |
| Men | 10,835 | 12,071 |
| M7 | 824 | 990 |
| Pool | Winner | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5:20:20+6:33:51 | 9:55:19+1:58:52 |
| Men | 5:20:20+6:33:51 | 9:53:09+2:01:02 |
| M7 | 6:34:35+5:19:36 | 10:32:00+1:22:11 |
Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.
The fun ranking
The 67th fastest François of 78. The quickest one did 7:04:29, the median François 10:14:10.
See the whole François ranking →Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.
Your AI ride analysis
Finishing 11,408th out of 12,733, you were behind your M7 category median on every single segment, but the Col du Galibier is where the gap opened widest -- about 37 minutes slower there than the M7 median, more than double the deficit you carried on the Croix de Fer or the Telegraphe. The descents show the same pattern in miniature: roughly 15 minutes back on the Galibier descent and 4 minutes back into Alpe d'Huez. Because the losses are spread across the whole route rather than isolated to one climb, pacing over-effort early looks like the culprit, with the Galibier landing hardest on tired legs. Next time, holding something back through the Croix de Fer and Telegraphe specifically to arrive fresher for the Galibier is the single change most likely to move this result.
Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.
Watch the ride 🎬
Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.
François DELATTRE moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.
Race position along the course
Climbs & segments
| Segment | Time | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley | 31:47 | 11,935 |
| Col de la Croix de FerClimb | 2:04:40 | 10,011 |
| Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley | 1:40:54 | 10,255 |
| Col du TélégrapheClimb | 1:21:27 | 11,055 |
| Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley | 17:25 | 9,931 |
| Col du GalibierClimb | 2:40:00 | 12,019 |
| Descente du GalibierDescent | 1:13:46 | 11,206 |
| Col de SarenneClimb | 1:37:31 | 9,566 |
| Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent | 26:41 | 10,894 |
| Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined | 6:06:07 | 11,504 |
| Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined | 1:40:27 | 11,081 |
“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.
How you compare, climb by climb
| Segment | You | Stage winner |
|---|---|---|
| Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer | 31:47 | Hugo VALADIER 20:51 |
| Col de la Croix de Fer | 2:04:40 | Simon COMBES 1:05:13 |
| Descente + vallée de la Maurienne | 1:40:54 | Antoine BERGER 52:00 |
| Col du Télégraphe | 1:21:27 | Luca CAVALLO 33:04 |
| Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire) | 17:25 | Robin BOURDIER 7:46 |
| Col du Galibier | 2:40:00 | Luca CAVALLO 50:25 |
| Descente du Galibier | 1:13:46 | Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38 |
| Col de Sarenne | 1:37:31 | Luca CAVALLO 39:52 |
| Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez | 26:41 | Gustave BRUYER 3:39 |
| Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier) | 6:06:07 | Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49 |
| Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées) | 1:40:27 | Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15 |
“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.
Checkpoint splits
| Checkpoint | Time | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| START | 0:00 | — |
| Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer | 31:47 | 11,599 |
| Col de la Croix de Fer | 2:36:27 | 10,145 |
| Pied de Col du Télégraphe | 4:17:21 | 10,141 |
| Col du Télégraphe | 5:38:48 | 10,515 |
| Pied de Col du Galibier | 5:56:13 | 9,874 |
| Tunnel du Galibier | 8:27:29 | 12,396 |
| Activation Canyon | 8:28:45 | 11,228 |
| Col du Galibier | 8:36:13 | 11,799 |
| Pied de Col de Sarenne | 9:49:59 | 11,774 |
| Col de Sarenne | 11:27:30 | 11,194 |
| FINISH | 11:54:11 | 11,408 |
Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.
6 races on this site
6 finishes across 3 events, matched by name.
| 2014 | Marathon de Paris 2014SEH | 4:16:20 | #12,832 |
| 2016 | Marathon de Paris 2016SEH | 4:14:06 | #9,879 |
| 2021 | Marathon de Paris 2021M0H | 3:47:11 | #8,762 |
| 2024 | Marathon de Paris 2024M1H | 4:41:41 | #41,482 |
| 2026 | L’Étape du Tour de France — this pageM7 | 11:54:11 | #11,408 |
| 2015 | Semi de Paris 2015V1H | 2:35:00 | #14,754 |
These are rows sharing the same first and last name. A name is only shown as one career when no single race ever contained two people with it — which rules out the names that are provably shared, but cannot rule out two strangers who never lined up together. If one of these is not you, the removal link at the foot of this page applies to it too.
Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.
Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.
One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.