Nicolas Sitter
L’Étape du Tour 2026

Bib #1194 · M3

8:35:46
Finish time
3,062 / 12,733
Overall
Where you finished
PoolPlaceOf
Overall3,06212,733
Men2,98312,071
M35071,822
What it took
PoolWinnerMedian
Overall5:20:20+3:15:269:55:19−1:19:33
Men5:20:20+3:15:269:53:09−1:17:23
M35:36:41+2:59:059:41:59−1:06:13

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 13th fastest Benjamin of 91. The quickest one did 6:28:59, the median Benjamin 10:04:30.

See the whole Benjamin ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Also rode L'Étape du Tour Femmes 2026name match
DNS

One of the 1,586 riders who entered both Étapes this year — see the doublé analysis.

Strong across the board: you beat the M3 median on every climb and descent — closest margin on Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire).

Your AI ride analysis

Sitting 3062nd out of 12733 riders, your race splits into a genuine strength and, in places, a soft spot. The standout moment came on Col du Galibier: about 14 minutes faster than the typical time for M3 riders there. The category comparison has no red flags: every segment sits at or under the M3 median. The takeaway is to protect and extend the Col du Galibier form into the next event.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00
Croix de FerTélégrapheGalibierSarenneFinishkm 0km 170BA
Benjamin ACHARD0 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Benjamin ACHARD moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

overall rank along the course (up = better)

Climbs & segments

SegmentTimeRank
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley24:111,958
Col de la Croix de FerClimb1:39:042,671
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley1:16:414,058
Col du TélégrapheClimb58:353,007
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley10:573,143
Col du GalibierClimb1:38:433,062
Descente du GalibierDescent54:045,092
Col de SarenneClimb1:15:483,531
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent17:431,679
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined4:16:222,604
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined1:11:473,870

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

SegmentYouStage winner
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer24:11Hugo VALADIER 20:51
Col de la Croix de Fer1:39:04Simon COMBES 1:05:13
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne1:16:41Antoine BERGER 52:00
Col du Télégraphe58:35Luca CAVALLO 33:04
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)10:57Robin BOURDIER 7:46
Col du Galibier1:38:43Luca CAVALLO 50:25
Descente du Galibier54:04Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38
Col de Sarenne1:15:48Luca CAVALLO 39:52
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez17:43Gustave BRUYER 3:39
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)4:16:22Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)1:11:47Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

CheckpointTimeRank
START0:00—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer24:111,937
Col de la Croix de Fer2:03:152,469
Pied de Col du Télégraphe3:19:562,971
Col du Télégraphe4:18:312,887
Pied de Col du Galibier4:29:282,630
Tunnel du Galibier6:00:553,000
Activation Canyon6:02:022,815
Col du Galibier6:08:112,923
Pied de Col de Sarenne7:02:153,121
Col de Sarenne8:18:032,970
FINISH8:35:463,062

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

12 races on this site

11 finishes across 3 events, matched by name.

L'Étape du Tour8 times
2016L'Étape du Tour 2016 — Megève → MorzineSEN-H5:15:24#1,807
2022L'Étape du Tour 2022 — Briançon → Alpe d'HuezM37:30:05#796
2023L'Étape du Tour 2023 — Annemasse → MorzineM26:13:05#924
2024L'Étape du Tour 2024 — Nice → Col de la CouilloleM36:16:14#689
2025L'Étape du Tour de France Femmes 2025 — 117 kmM35:02:03#314
2025L'Étape du Tour de France 2025M36:22:02#1,560
2026L’Étape du Tour de France — this pageM38:35:46#3,062
2026117 kmDNS
La Marmotte Granfondo Alpes3 times
2020La Marmotte Granfondo Alpes 2020M307:11:08#227
2023La Marmotte Granfondo Alpes 2023M308:16:29#605
2025La Marmotte Granfondo Alpes 2025M308:13:16#986
Marathon de Paris1 time
2013Marathon de Paris 2013SH3:31:33#4,497

These are rows sharing the same first and last name. A name is only shown as one career when no single race ever contained two people with it — which rules out the names that are provably shared, but cannot rule out two strangers who never lined up together. If one of these is not you, the removal link at the foot of this page applies to it too.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.