Bib #11692 · M9 · ACC Bordeaux

Pascal BAYERD

10:15:47

Finish time

7,263 / 12,733

Overall

Where you finished

Pool	Place	Of
Overall	7,263	12,733
Men	6,959	12,071
M9	72	210

What it took

Pool	Winner	Median
Overall	5:20:20+4:55:27	9:55:19+20:28
Men	5:20:20+4:55:27	9:53:09+22:38
M9	7:26:22+2:49:25	10:52:08−36:21

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 32nd fastest Pascal of 66. The quickest one did 6:34:35, the median Pascal 10:21:00.

See the whole Pascal ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Club ranking

2nd of 2 from ACC Bordeaux. Its quickest did 9:33:41, its median 9:54:44.

See the whole ACC Bordeaux club page →

Among classified finishers from this club only, ties sharing a place. This is not the club classification, which scores each club on its 3 best times.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the M9 median was on Descente du Galibier — 8:27 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

A rough patch on the Descente du Galibier left you about 8 minutes behind the M9 median, the costliest stretch of the route. Elsewhere the Col du Galibier was a genuine bright spot, about 22 minutes faster than the median. Finishing 7,263 out of 12,733, you sat in the back half of the men's field this time. Spending more time on technical descents similar to the Descente du Galibier in training would be the most concrete way to trim that deficit.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Race position along the course

Climbs & segments

Segment	Time	Rank	Top %	vs median
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley	30:03	9,532	66%	+1:27
Col de la Croix de FerClimb	1:57:43	7,823	55%	+2:10
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley	1:38:18	9,646	69%	+10:23
Col du TélégrapheClimb	1:08:49	6,915	50%	+2s
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley	21:56	11,602	86%	+8:30
Col du GalibierClimb	1:48:11	4,820	38%	−7:14
Descente du GalibierDescent	1:08:11	10,036	80%	+11:04
Col de SarenneClimb	1:19:56	4,848	39%	−4:44
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent	22:40	7,394	59%	+59s
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined	4:54:43	5,840	47%	−4:07
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined	1:30:51	9,353	76%	+11:19

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

Segment	You	Stage winner	M9 leader	GC avg / median	M9 avg / median
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer	30:03	Hugo VALADIER 20:51	Jean-marie LEMOINE 23:06	28:36 / 28:36	30:30 / 30:12
Col de la Croix de Fer	1:57:43	Simon COMBES 1:05:13	Thierry COUDERETTE 1:29:08	1:55:29 / 1:55:33	2:08:28 / 2:06:50
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne	1:38:18	Antoine BERGER 52:00	Thierry COUDERETTE 1:01:40	1:28:54 / 1:27:55	1:35:10 / 1:35:52
Col du Télégraphe	1:08:49	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	Didier BOUSCARY 50:58	1:10:11 / 1:08:47	1:18:55 / 1:17:14
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)	21:56	Robin BOURDIER 7:46	Eric PARADON 9:16	15:48 / 13:26	17:43 / 15:38
Col du Galibier	1:48:11	Luca CAVALLO 50:25	Eric PARADON 1:23:10	1:56:29 / 1:55:25	2:09:42 / 2:10:06
Descente du Galibier	1:08:11	Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38	Eric PARADON 40:00	58:21 / 57:07	1:00:52 / 59:44
Col de Sarenne	1:19:56	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	Patrick BERTHOU 1:06:59	1:26:19 / 1:24:40	1:36:22 / 1:36:33
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez	22:40	Gustave BRUYER 3:39	Eric PARADON 16:36	22:12 / 21:41	23:53 / 23:43
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)	4:54:43	Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49	Eric PARADON 3:44:30	4:57:35 / 4:58:50	5:26:39 / 5:30:01
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)	1:30:51	Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15	Eric PARADON 56:36	1:20:41 / 1:19:32	1:24:38 / 1:23:36

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

Checkpoint	Km	Time	Rank	vs median
START	0	0:00	—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer	14.8	30:03	9,312	+1:27
Col de la Croix de Fer	38.5	2:27:46	7,876	+3:31
Pied de Col du Télégraphe	80.1	4:06:04	8,623	+13:16
Col du Télégraphe	92	5:14:53	8,156	+12:55
Pied de Col du Galibier	97.3	5:36:49	8,287	+18:01
Tunnel du Galibier	114.6	7:17:13	7,985	+12:07
Activation Canyon	115	7:18:27	7,281	+15:19
Col du Galibier	115.6	7:25:00	7,597	+16:10
Pied de Col de Sarenne	140.2	8:33:11	7,768	+25:07
Col de Sarenne	161	9:53:07	7,092	+18:00
FINISH	170	10:15:47	7,263	+20:27

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.