Nicolas Sitter
La Marmotte 2026

Bib #8302 · CAN · M30

10:53:46
Net time (ranked)
the official basis
3,835 / 5,005
Overall
classified riders
Where you finished
PoolPlaceOf
Overall3,8355,005
Men3,6524,729
Men 30–391,1381,405
What it took
PoolWinnerMedian
Overall5:07:10+5:46:369:34:32+1:19:14
Men5:07:10+5:46:369:32:56+1:20:50
Men 30–395:08:25+5:45:219:09:37+1:44:09

Winner and median are over classified riders only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 2nd fastest Graeme of 3. The quickest one did 10:30:01, the median Graeme 10:53:46.

See the whole Graeme ranking →

Among classified riders only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

This official time contains an untimed section

Graeme is missing a mat read at one end of the la grave traverse, and the credit needs both. So the time above includes minutes the rest of the field had subtracted — a median of 37:57 for the Glandon descent, 6:39 for La Grave.

The credit requires BOTH mats bounding a neutralised section, and the timekeeper does not compensate when one is missed. A rider who lost a read is therefore charged for a section the rest of the field rode for free — in their own official time, and so in their rank. We publish that time exactly as the timekeeper does, and we say when it applies.

1,322 riders on this event are in the same position. What that does to their rank →

⚠️ This rider’s chip was read at only 10 of the 12 timing mats — segment times that need a missing mat can’t be computed, and they are absent from the corresponding leaderboards. The overall result is unaffected.

The two clocks

11:40:09
Gross (chip)
start mat → line
46:23
− Glandon descent
credited
0:00
− La Grave
not credited
10:53:46
Net — the result
the ranked time

Every rank on this site is on NET time — the official basis, gross minus both neutralisation credits. The gross chip time (what the rider’s own computer showed) is shown next to it where it is useful, but sorting the field on it produces 2,457 disagreements with the published ranking, so it never ranks anything here.

Official links

Heads-up on the diploma: the time printed on it is Graeme’s correct net time, but the position baked into that PDF is a rank by gross time — it disagrees with the official classification for 4,967 of the 5,005 finishers. The rank on this page is the official one.

Room to improve: the biggest loss against the field median was on Saint-Étienne-de-Cuines → Col du Télégraphe 17:12 slower than the median rider.

Race position at every mat

overall rank at each timing mat, in course order (up = better)

Mats are evenly spaced, not placed by distance — the two neutralised sections would otherwise appear as a vertical jump, since no time passes across them.

Cols & sections

SectionTimeRank
Bourg d'Oisans → Col du GlandonClimb2:20:383,672
Saint-Étienne-de-Cuines → Col du TélégrapheCombined2:25:023,729
Col du Télégraphe → ValloireDescent40:024,694
Valloire → Col du GalibierClimbmat missed at CT5 — Col du Galibier
Col du Galibier → La GraveDescentmat missed at CT5 — Col du Galibier
La Grave → Pied de l'AlpeDescent1:00:424,319
Montée de l'Alpe d'HuezClimb1:49:333,375

“Top %” = section rank as a share of the riders timed on it. Seven sections cover 157 of the 177 km; the missing 20 km are the two neutralised stretches, which cannot be ranked because in net time they take no time at all.

Splits at every mat

MatElapsed (net)Since previousRank
Départ — Bourg d'Oisans0:00
CT1 — Col du Glandon2:20:382:20:383,673
CT2 — Saint-Étienne-de-Cuines2:20:38neutralised3,659
CT3 — Col du Télégraphe4:45:412:25:033,545
CT4 — Valloire / Les Verneys5:25:4340:024,067
CT7 — La Grave (sortie)8:03:302:37:473,904
CT8 — Bourg d'Oisans (Marmotton)8:46:3943:093,958
CT9 — Pied de l'Alpe9:04:1317:343,964
Preview mat10:53:261:49:133,830
Arrivée — Alpe d'Huez10:53:460:203,835

“Since previous” is net time between consecutive mats, so the two neutralised stretches read neutralised rather than 0:00 — and no km/h is computed across them, because dividing a real distance by zero seconds has no answer. The timekeeper publishes its own course kilometres for eleven of the twelve mats ("39km Glandon"), so distances here are measured, not interpolated — they are integers, so read ±0.5 km into each. The one exception is the preview mat: its label says km 176, but it sits a median of 22.7 seconds before the line — about 50 metres — so it is placed at 176.95 and marked ≈.

Times as published by the official timekeeping, ranked on net time. Search another rider.