Bib #4268 · ESP · M70
Ramon ROIG
Compare with other riders| Pool | Place | Of |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4,104 | 5,005 |
| Men | 3,898 | 4,729 |
| Men 70+ | 8 | 10 |
| Pool | Winner | Median |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5:07:10+6:03:50 | 9:34:32+1:36:28 |
| Men | 5:07:10+6:03:50 | 9:32:56+1:38:04 |
| Men 70+ | 7:39:00+3:32:00 | 10:22:29+48:31 |
Winner and median are over classified riders only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.
The fun ranking
The 2nd fastest Ramon of 2. The quickest one did 10:36:11, the median Ramon 10:53:36.
See the whole Ramon ranking →Among classified riders only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.
Ramon is missing a mat read at one end of the glandon descent, and the credit needs both. So the time above includes minutes the rest of the field had subtracted — a median of 37:57 for the Glandon descent, 6:39 for La Grave.
The credit requires BOTH mats bounding a neutralised section, and the timekeeper does not compensate when one is missed. A rider who lost a read is therefore charged for a section the rest of the field rode for free — in their own official time, and so in their rank. We publish that time exactly as the timekeeper does, and we say when it applies.
1,322 riders on this event are in the same position. What that does to their rank →
The two clocks
Every rank on this site is on NET time — the official basis, gross minus both neutralisation credits. The gross chip time (what the rider’s own computer showed) is shown next to it where it is useful, but sorting the field on it produces 2,457 disagreements with the published ranking, so it never ranks anything here.
Official links
Heads-up on the diploma: the time printed on it is Ramon’s correct net time, but the position baked into that PDF is a rank by gross time — it disagrees with the official classification for 4,967 of the 5,005 finishers. The rank on this page is the official one.
Race position at every mat
Mats are evenly spaced, not placed by distance — the two neutralised sections would otherwise appear as a vertical jump, since no time passes across them.
Cols & sections
| Section | Time | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Bourg d'Oisans → Col du GlandonClimb | mat missed at CT1 — Col du Glandon | — |
| Saint-Étienne-de-Cuines → Col du TélégrapheCombined | 2:22:12 | 3,549 |
| Col du Télégraphe → ValloireDescent | 29:29 | 3,605 |
| Valloire → Col du GalibierClimb | 2:06:52 | 3,352 |
| Col du Galibier → La GraveDescent | 23:51 | 1,829 |
| La Grave → Pied de l'AlpeDescent | 57:53 | 4,118 |
| Montée de l'Alpe d'HuezClimb | 1:53:01 | 3,627 |
“Top %” = section rank as a share of the riders timed on it. Seven sections cover 157 of the 177 km; the missing 20 km are the two neutralised stretches, which cannot be ranked because in net time they take no time at all.
Splits at every mat
| Mat | Elapsed (net) | Since previous | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Départ — Bourg d'Oisans | 0:00 | — | — |
| CT2 — Saint-Étienne-de-Cuines | 2:57:38 | 2:57:38 | 5,336 |
| CT3 — Col du Télégraphe | 5:19:51 | 2:22:13 | 4,666 |
| CT4 — Valloire / Les Verneys | 5:49:21 | 29:30 | 4,787 |
| CT5 — Col du Galibier | 7:56:13 | 2:06:52 | 3,866 |
| CT6 — La Grave (entrée) | 8:20:05 | 23:52 | 4,036 |
| CT7 — La Grave (sortie) | 8:20:05 | neutralised | 4,330 |
| CT8 — Bourg d'Oisans (Marmotton) | 8:57:26 | 37:21 | 4,220 |
| CT9 — Pied de l'Alpe | 9:17:58 | 20:32 | 4,266 |
| Preview mat | 11:10:37 | 1:52:39 | 4,097 |
| Arrivée — Alpe d'Huez | 11:11:00 | 0:23 | 4,104 |
“Since previous” is net time between consecutive mats, so the two neutralised stretches read neutralised rather than 0:00 — and no km/h is computed across them, because dividing a real distance by zero seconds has no answer. The timekeeper publishes its own course kilometres for eleven of the twelve mats ("39km Glandon"), so distances here are measured, not interpolated — they are integers, so read ±0.5 km into each. The one exception is the preview mat: its label says km 176, but it sits a median of 22.7 seconds before the line — about 50 metres — so it is placed at 176.95 and marked ≈.
Times as published by the official timekeeping, ranked on net time. Search another rider.
Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of La Marmotte Granfondo Alpes 2026, published by ChronoRace. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.
Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct, with nothing on it that names you. More in the privacy notice.
Your other races on this site are not linked to this page unless you ask. If you would like them listed here, use “Link my races” at the top of this page.
One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.