Nicolas Sitter
La Marmotte 2026

Bib #2680 · FRA · M18

9:51:37
Net time (ranked)
the official basis
2,785 / 5,005
Overall
classified riders
Where you finished
PoolPlaceOf
Overall2,7855,005
Men2,6584,729
Men 18–29475701
What it took
PoolWinnerMedian
Overall5:07:10+4:44:279:34:32+17:05
Men5:07:10+4:44:279:32:56+18:41
Men 18–295:07:10+4:44:278:56:19+55:18

Winner and median are over classified riders only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 2nd fastest Théophile of 4. The quickest one did 6:01:07, the median Théophile 10:35:54.

See the whole Théophile ranking →

Among classified riders only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

The two clocks

10:43:20
Gross (chip)
start mat → line
40:56
− Glandon descent
credited
10:45
− La Grave
credited
9:51:37
Net — the result
the ranked time

Every rank on this site is on NET time — the official basis, gross minus both neutralisation credits. The gross chip time (what the rider’s own computer showed) is shown next to it where it is useful, but sorting the field on it produces 2,457 disagreements with the published ranking, so it never ranks anything here.

Official links

Heads-up on the diploma: the time printed on it is Théophile’s correct net time, but the position baked into that PDF is a rank by gross time — it disagrees with the official classification for 4,967 of the 5,005 finishers. The rank on this page is the official one.

Room to improve: the biggest loss against the field median was on Saint-Étienne-de-Cuines → Col du Télégraphe — 13:08 slower than the median rider.

Race position at every mat

overall rank at each timing mat, in course order (up = better)

Mats are evenly spaced, not placed by distance — the two neutralised sections would otherwise appear as a vertical jump, since no time passes across them.

Cols & sections

SectionTimeRank
Bourg d'Oisans → Col du GlandonClimb2:01:591,577
Saint-Étienne-de-Cuines → Col du TélégrapheCombined2:20:583,471
Col du Télégraphe → ValloireDescent33:564,215
Valloire → Col du GalibierClimb1:53:542,663
Col du Galibier → La GraveDescent26:193,051
La Grave → Pied de l'AlpeDescent57:134,052
Montée de l'Alpe d'HuezClimb1:37:152,376

“Top %” = section rank as a share of the riders timed on it. Seven sections cover 157 of the 177 km; the missing 20 km are the two neutralised stretches, which cannot be ranked because in net time they take no time at all.

Splits at every mat

MatElapsed (net)Since previousRank
Départ — Bourg d'Oisans0:00——
CT1 — Col du Glandon2:01:592:01:591,578
CT2 — Saint-Étienne-de-Cuines2:01:59neutralised1,570
CT3 — Col du Télégraphe4:22:582:20:592,605
CT4 — Valloire / Les Verneys4:56:5433:562,975
CT5 — Col du Galibier6:50:491:53:552,816
CT6 — La Grave (entrée)7:17:0926:202,803
CT7 — La Grave (sortie)7:17:09neutralised2,809
CT8 — Bourg d'Oisans (Marmotton)7:58:2841:192,877
CT9 — Pied de l'Alpe8:14:2215:542,952
Preview mat9:51:191:36:572,782
Arrivée — Alpe d'Huez9:51:370:182,785

“Since previous” is net time between consecutive mats, so the two neutralised stretches read neutralised rather than 0:00 — and no km/h is computed across them, because dividing a real distance by zero seconds has no answer. The timekeeper publishes its own course kilometres for eleven of the twelve mats ("39km Glandon"), so distances here are measured, not interpolated — they are integers, so read ±0.5 km into each. The one exception is the preview mat: its label says km 176, but it sits a median of 22.7 seconds before the line — about 50 metres — so it is placed at 176.95 and marked ≈.

Times as published by the official timekeeping, ranked on net time. Search another rider.

2 races on this site

2 finishes across 2 events, matched by name.

Marathon de Paris1 time
2023Marathon de Paris 2023SEH3:26:00#8,440
La Marmotte Granfondo Alpes1 time
2026La Marmotte Granfondo Alpes 2026 — this pageM189:51:37#2,785

These are rows sharing the same first and last name. A name is only shown as one career when no single race ever contained two people with it — which rules out the names that are provably shared, but cannot rule out two strangers who never lined up together. If one of these is not you, the removal link at the foot of this page applies to it too.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of La Marmotte Granfondo Alpes 2026, published by ChronoRace. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct — nothing that identifies you is kept.

Ask me to remove my name

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.