Cecile #9908

9:51:20

Finish time

6,204 / 12,733

Overall

Where you finished

Pool	Place	Of
Overall	6,204	12,733
Women	238	662
W5	24	79

What it took

Pool	Winner	Median
Overall	5:20:20+4:31:00	9:55:19−3:59
Women	6:19:12+3:32:08	10:26:42−35:22
W5	6:45:03+3:06:17	10:37:58−46:38

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 2nd fastest Cécile of 4 (all spellings of Cécile, including Cecile). The quickest one did 7:51:22, the median Cécile 10:14:50.

See the whole Cécile ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the W5 median was on Descente du Galibier — 1:38 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

It took a mixed set of splits to finish 6204th out of 12,733 in W5, and they're worth unpacking. Your split on the Col de la Croix de Fer was about 13 minutes faster than the W5 median — a genuine highlight. The clearest weakness in the data is the Descente du Galibier, about 2 minutes slower than the W5 median. Given how much the Descente du Galibier cost you, that's where the next training cycle should be aimed.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00

Cecile #99080 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Cecile #9908 moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

Climbs & segments

Segment	Time	Rank	Top %	vs median
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley	26:45	4,666	32%	−1:51
Col de la Croix de FerClimb	1:49:11	5,160	36%	−6:22
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley	1:20:39	5,060	36%	−7:16
Col du TélégrapheClimb	1:12:25	8,347	60%	+3:38
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley	12:13	5,124	38%	−1:13
Col du GalibierClimb	1:58:11	6,811	54%	+2:46
Descente du GalibierDescent	1:05:02	9,147	73%	+7:55
Col de SarenneClimb	1:24:41	6,260	50%	+1s
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent	22:13	6,868	55%	+32s
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined	4:59:47	6,342	51%	+57s
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined	1:27:15	8,397	68%	+7:43

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

Segment	You	Stage winner	W5 leader	GC avg / median	W5 avg / median
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer	26:45	Hugo #945 20:51	Sophie DUARTE 21:54	28:36 / 28:36	31:18 / 29:48
Col de la Croix de Fer	1:49:11	Simon #527 1:05:13	Sophie DUARTE 1:21:54	1:55:29 / 1:55:33	2:03:49 / 2:02:40
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne	1:20:39	Antoine BERGER 52:00	Sophie DUARTE 1:02:11	1:28:54 / 1:27:55	1:35:22 / 1:33:06
Col du Télégraphe	1:12:25	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	Sophie DUARTE 44:54	1:10:11 / 1:08:47	1:13:38 / 1:13:01
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)	12:13	Robin #10 7:46	Sophie DUARTE 8:30	15:48 / 13:26	16:37 / 15:10
Col du Galibier	1:58:11	Luca CAVALLO 50:25	Sophie DUARTE 1:09:50	1:56:29 / 1:55:25	2:01:55 / 2:01:40
Descente du Galibier	1:05:02	Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38	Sophie DUARTE 41:39	58:21 / 57:07	1:04:04 / 1:03:24
Col de Sarenne	1:24:41	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	Sophie DUARTE 57:46	1:26:19 / 1:24:40	1:33:47 / 1:30:56
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez	22:13	Gustave #1746 3:39	Sophie DUARTE 16:25	22:12 / 21:41	23:32 / 22:30
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)	4:59:47	Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49	Sophie DUARTE 3:16:38	4:57:35 / 4:58:50	5:16:54 / 5:13:16
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)	1:27:15	Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15	Sophie DUARTE 58:04	1:20:41 / 1:19:32	1:27:37 / 1:26:20

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

Checkpoint	Km	Time	Rank	vs median
START	0	0:00	—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer	14.8	26:45	4,616	−1:51
Col de la Croix de Fer	38.5	2:15:56	4,962	−8:19
Pied de Col du Télégraphe	80.1	3:36:35	4,886	−16:13
Col du Télégraphe	92	4:49:00	5,598	−12:58
Pied de Col du Galibier	97.3	5:01:13	5,245	−17:35
Tunnel du Galibier	114.6	6:52:08	6,213	−12:58
Activation Canyon	115	6:53:16	5,700	−9:52
Col du Galibier	115.6	6:59:24	5,896	−9:26
Pied de Col de Sarenne	140.2	8:04:26	6,240	−3:38
Col de Sarenne	161	9:29:07	5,998	−6:00
FINISH	170	9:51:20	6,204	−4:00

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct, with nothing on it that names you. More in the privacy notice.

Ask me to remove my name

Your other races on this site are not linked to this page unless you ask. If you would like them listed here, use “Link my races” at the top of this page.

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.