Nicolas Sitter
L’Étape du Tour 2026

Bib #9357 · FR · M2 · Sud Oise Cyclisme

12:01:27
Finish time
11,664 / 12,733
Overall
Where you finished
PoolPlaceOf
Overall11,66412,733
Men11,08412,071
M21,7401,853
What it took
PoolWinnerMedian
Overall5:20:20+6:41:079:55:19+2:06:08
Men5:20:20+6:41:079:53:09+2:08:18
M25:24:31+6:36:569:38:50+2:22:37

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 2nd fastest Ibrahim of 2. The quickest one did 7:59:43, the median Ibrahim 10:00:35.

See the whole Ibrahim ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Club ranking

3rd of 3 from Sud Oise Cyclisme. Its quickest did 6:39:36, its median 8:11:27.

See the whole Sud Oise Cyclisme club page →

Among classified finishers from this club only, ties sharing a place. This is not the club classification, which scores each club on its 3 best times.

⚠️ This rider’s chip was only read at 10 of the 12 timing mats — segment times that need a missing mat can’t be computed, and this rider is absent from the corresponding leaderboards.
Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the M2 median was on Descente + vallée de la Maurienne 36:41 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

A 11664th-place finish among 12733 M2 riders, but the data flags a specific weak link. You gave up about 37 minutes on the Descente + vallée de la Maurienne section alone, finishing it in 121m44s versus the 85m03s category median. Outside of that one section, the rest of the race stayed tight to the field; the Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire) section was only about a minute off the median. That's the one number worth chasing: trim about 37 minutes off the Descente + vallée de la Maurienne section and this becomes a genuinely strong result.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Race position along the course

overall rank along the course (up = better)

Climbs & segments

SegmentTimeRank
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley30:089,646
Col de la Croix de FerClimb2:03:099,528
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley2:01:4413,416
Col du TélégrapheClimb1:32:4512,835
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley14:097,600
Col du GalibierClimbmat missed at Col du Galibier
Descente du GalibierDescentmat missed at Col du Galibier
Col de SarenneClimb1:44:4710,832
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent25:029,750
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combinedincomplete mat data
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combinedincomplete mat data

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

SegmentYouStage winner
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer30:08Hugo VALADIER 20:51
Col de la Croix de Fer2:03:09Simon COMBES 1:05:13
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne2:01:44Antoine BERGER 52:00
Col du Télégraphe1:32:45Luca CAVALLO 33:04
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)14:09Robin BOURDIER 7:46
Col de Sarenne1:44:47Luca CAVALLO 39:52
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez25:02Gustave BRUYER 3:39

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

CheckpointTimeRank
START0:00
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer30:089,454
Col de la Croix de Fer2:33:179,421
Pied de Col du Télégraphe4:35:0112,157
Col du Télégraphe6:07:4612,628
Pied de Col du Galibier6:21:5511,624
Tunnel du Galibier8:50:5513,315
Pied de Col de Sarenne9:51:3811,841
Col de Sarenne11:36:2511,512
FINISH12:01:2711,664

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.