Charles #6006

10:42:06

Finish time

8,382 / 12,733

Overall

Where you finished

Pool	Place	Of
Overall	8,382	12,733
Men	8,008	12,071
M4	995	1,439

What it took

Pool	Winner	Median
Overall	5:20:20+5:21:46	9:55:19+46:47
Men	5:20:20+5:21:46	9:53:09+48:57
M4	5:55:40+4:46:26	9:53:35+48:31

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 39th fastest Charles of 60. The quickest one did 6:28:20, the median Charles 10:03:32.

See the whole Charles ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the M4 median was on Descente du Galibier — 29:19 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

At 8,382nd in M4, the Galibier descent was where your race really slipped — over 29 minutes slower than the category median, by far your largest gap. You actually beat median on the climb itself by over 7 minutes, underlining that this is a descending-specific issue rather than a fitness one. More technical descending practice, focused on confidence at speed, is the clearest way to close this.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00

Charles #60060 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Charles #6006 moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

Climbs & segments

Segment	Time	Rank	Top %	vs median
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley	34:24	13,792	96%	+5:48
Col de la Croix de FerClimb	2:02:43	9,418	66%	+7:10
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley	1:46:48	11,555	83%	+18:53
Col du TélégrapheClimb	1:08:53	6,945	50%	+6s
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley	14:43	8,154	60%	+1:17
Col du GalibierClimb	1:46:35	4,514	36%	−8:50
Descente du GalibierDescent	1:26:09	12,275	98%	+29:02
Col de SarenneClimb	1:16:47	3,843	31%	−7:53
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent	25:04	9,782	78%	+3:23
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined	4:58:11	6,191	50%	−0:39
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined	1:51:13	11,968	97%	+31:41

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

Segment	You	Stage winner	M4 leader	GC avg / median	M4 avg / median
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer	34:24	Hugo #945 20:51	Sebastian #31 20:54	28:36 / 28:36	28:32 / 28:46
Col de la Croix de Fer	2:02:43	Simon #527 1:05:13	Sebastian #31 1:07:54	1:55:29 / 1:55:33	1:55:24 / 1:54:50
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne	1:46:48	Antoine BERGER 52:00	Alexandre #739 56:28	1:28:54 / 1:27:55	1:28:40 / 1:26:52
Col du Télégraphe	1:08:53	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	Alexandre #739 38:57	1:10:11 / 1:08:47	1:09:43 / 1:08:09
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)	14:43	Robin #10 7:46	Alexandre #739 7:59	15:48 / 13:26	15:41 / 13:28
Col du Galibier	1:46:35	Luca CAVALLO 50:25	Jonathan #53 1:00:24	1:56:29 / 1:55:25	1:56:02 / 1:53:56
Descente du Galibier	1:26:09	Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38	Alexandre #739 37:18	58:21 / 57:07	58:24 / 56:50
Col de Sarenne	1:16:47	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	Naoto #3972 50:07	1:26:19 / 1:24:40	1:26:23 / 1:24:05
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez	25:04	Gustave #1746 3:39	Baptiste #196 14:19	22:12 / 21:41	22:08 / 21:39
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)	4:58:11	Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49	Alexandre #739 2:50:13	4:57:35 / 4:58:50	4:56:45 / 4:56:26
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)	1:51:13	Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15	Baptiste #196 52:33	1:20:41 / 1:19:32	1:20:34 / 1:18:51

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

Checkpoint	Km	Time	Rank	vs median
START	0	0:00	—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer	14.8	34:24	13,338	+5:48
Col de la Croix de Fer	38.5	2:37:07	10,288	+12:52
Pied de Col du Télégraphe	80.1	4:23:55	10,987	+31:07
Col du Télégraphe	92	5:32:48	9,929	+30:50
Pied de Col du Galibier	97.3	5:47:31	9,137	+28:43
Tunnel du Galibier	114.6	7:27:09	8,605	+22:03
Activation Canyon	115	7:28:09	7,831	+25:01
Col du Galibier	115.6	7:34:06	8,124	+25:16
Pied de Col de Sarenne	140.2	9:00:15	9,195	+52:11
Col de Sarenne	161	10:17:02	8,155	+41:55
FINISH	170	10:42:06	8,382	+46:46

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct, with nothing on it that names you. More in the privacy notice.

Ask me to remove my name

Your other races on this site are not linked to this page unless you ask. If you would like them listed here, use “Link my races” at the top of this page.

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.