Is this you, and did you run other races on this site?Link my races

Clément #517

6:11:43

Finish time

87 / 12,733

Overall

Where you finished

Pool	Place	Of
Overall	87	12,733
Men	87	12,071
M2	20	1,853

What it took

Pool	Winner	Median
Overall	5:20:20+51:23	9:55:19−3:43:36
Men	5:20:20+51:23	9:53:09−3:41:26
M2	5:24:31+47:12	9:38:50−3:27:07

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 1st fastest Clément of 128. The quickest one did 6:11:43, the median Clément 9:24:02.

See the whole Clément ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Club ranking

1st of 2 from Uniteam Cycling. Its quickest did 6:11:43, its median 7:49:20.

See the whole Uniteam Cycling club page →

Among classified finishers from this club only, ties sharing a place. This is not the club classification, which scores each club on its 3 best times.

Strong across the board: you beat the M2 median on every climb and descent — closest margin on Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire).

Your AI ride analysis

The single best number in your file is the Col du Galibier split, about 50 minutes faster than your category median. In category M2, your overall placing was 87 out of 12733. Consistency was the theme — every segment came in at or under the category median, no exceptions. That kind of even performance across every terrain type is genuinely hard to fault.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00

Clément #5170 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Clément #517 moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

Climbs & segments

Segment	Time	Rank	Top %	vs median
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley	20:55	44	1%	−7:41
Col de la Croix de FerClimb	1:17:13	230	2%	−38:20
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley	1:00:01	333	2%	−27:54
Col du TélégrapheClimb	42:53	180	1%	−25:54
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley	7:56	17	1%	−5:30
Col du GalibierClimb	1:02:00	50	1%	−53:25
Descente du GalibierDescent	38:46	153	1%	−18:21
Col de SarenneClimb	mat missed at Col de Sarenne	—	—	—
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent	mat missed at Col de Sarenne	—	—	—
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined	3:02:06	108	1%	−1:56:44
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined	incomplete mat data	—	—	—

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

Segment	You	Stage winner	M2 leader	GC avg / median	M2 avg / median
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer	20:55	Hugo #945 20:51	Simon #8 20:53	28:36 / 28:36	28:20 / 28:12
Col de la Croix de Fer	1:17:13	Simon #527 1:05:13	Thibaut CLÉMENT 1:05:16	1:55:29 / 1:55:33	1:51:43 / 1:51:22
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne	1:00:01	Antoine BERGER 52:00	Thibaut CLÉMENT 53:24	1:28:54 / 1:27:55	1:27:02 / 1:25:03
Col du Télégraphe	42:53	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	Thibaut CLÉMENT 33:06	1:10:11 / 1:08:47	1:07:29 / 1:06:00
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)	7:56	Robin #10 7:46	Maxence #608 7:51	15:48 / 13:26	14:53 / 12:43
Col du Galibier	1:02:00	Luca CAVALLO 50:25	Thibaut CLÉMENT 52:51	1:56:29 / 1:55:25	1:53:35 / 1:51:55
Descente du Galibier	38:46	Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38	Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38	58:21 / 57:07	58:18 / 56:50
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)	3:02:06	Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49	Thibaut CLÉMENT 2:31:13	4:57:35 / 4:58:50	4:49:54 / 4:50:16

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

Checkpoint	Km	Time	Rank	vs median
START	0	0:00	—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer	14.8	20:55	55	−7:41
Col de la Croix de Fer	38.5	1:38:08	192	−46:07
Pied de Col du Télégraphe	80.1	2:38:09	185	−1:14:39
Col du Télégraphe	92	3:21:02	191	−1:40:56
Pied de Col du Galibier	97.3	3:28:58	160	−1:49:50
Tunnel du Galibier	114.6	4:26:00	111	−2:39:06
Activation Canyon	115	4:26:38	103	−2:36:30
Col du Galibier	115.6	4:30:58	112	−2:37:52
Pied de Col de Sarenne	140.2	5:09:44	106	−2:58:20
FINISH	170	6:11:43	87	−3:43:37

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct, with nothing on it that names you. More in the privacy notice.

Ask me to remove my name

Your other races on this site are not linked to this page unless you ask. If you would like them listed here, use “Link my races” at the top of this page.

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.