Pauline #2768

10:20:55

Finish time

7,483 / 12,733

Overall

Where you finished

Pool	Place	Of
Overall	7,483	12,733
Women	315	662
W1	88	165

What it took

Pool	Winner	Median
Overall	5:20:20+5:00:35	9:55:19+25:36
Women	6:19:12+4:01:43	10:26:42−5:47
W1	6:28:01+3:52:54	10:12:50+8:05

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 4th fastest Pauline of 7. The quickest one did 9:06:36, the median Pauline 10:20:55.

See the whole Pauline ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the W1 median was on Col du Galibier — 10:16 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

Stack yourself against 12,733 other finishers and you come out 7483rd, in the back half of the field, but not far off the middle in W1. Your best split relative to peers came on Descente + vallée de la Maurienne, about 4 minutes up on the W1 median. Col du Galibier is the section to look at first, about 10 minutes off the pace of the W1 median. Put col du Galibier at the top of the list for focused training — that's where the biggest gain is waiting.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00

Pauline #27680 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Pauline #2768 moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

Climbs & segments

Segment	Time	Rank	Top %	vs median
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley	29:02	7,873	55%	+26s
Col de la Croix de FerClimb	2:00:40	8,774	62%	+5:07
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley	1:24:59	6,225	45%	−2:56
Col du TélégrapheClimb	1:13:53	8,878	64%	+5:06
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley	12:02	4,876	36%	−1:24
Col du GalibierClimb	2:06:15	8,375	67%	+10:50
Descente du GalibierDescent	57:23	6,373	51%	+16s
Col de SarenneClimb	1:33:28	8,639	69%	+8:48
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent	23:13	7,984	64%	+1:32
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined	5:20:48	8,277	66%	+21:58
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined	1:20:36	6,502	53%	+1:04

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

Segment	You	Stage winner	W1 leader	GC avg / median	W1 avg / median
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer	29:02	Hugo #945 20:51	Annalisa PRATO 21:19	28:36 / 28:36	28:58 / 28:49
Col de la Croix de Fer	2:00:40	Simon #527 1:05:13	Annalisa PRATO 1:20:01	1:55:29 / 1:55:33	2:00:42 / 2:00:34
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne	1:24:59	Antoine BERGER 52:00	Annalisa PRATO 1:00:25	1:28:54 / 1:27:55	1:30:59 / 1:28:46
Col du Télégraphe	1:13:53	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	Annalisa PRATO 45:17	1:10:11 / 1:08:47	1:12:29 / 1:10:35
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)	12:02	Robin #10 7:46	Nell DUVILLARD 8:50	15:48 / 13:26	16:26 / 13:28
Col du Galibier	2:06:15	Luca CAVALLO 50:25	Annalisa PRATO 1:06:01	1:56:29 / 1:55:25	1:56:26 / 1:55:59
Descente du Galibier	57:23	Thibaut CLÉMENT 34:38	Zélie BERGSMA 39:03	58:21 / 57:07	59:48 / 58:54
Col de Sarenne	1:33:28	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	Annalisa PRATO 51:21	1:26:19 / 1:24:40	1:26:57 / 1:25:41
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez	23:13	Gustave #1746 3:39	Annalisa PRATO 14:56	22:12 / 21:41	23:03 / 22:32
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)	5:20:48	Luca CAVALLO 2:28:49	Annalisa PRATO 3:11:19	4:57:35 / 4:58:50	5:05:19 / 5:05:16
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)	1:20:36	Thibaut CLÉMENT 47:15	Zélie BERGSMA 54:22	1:20:41 / 1:19:32	1:22:50 / 1:22:51

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

Checkpoint	Km	Time	Rank	vs median
START	0	0:00	—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer	14.8	29:02	7,731	+26s
Col de la Croix de Fer	38.5	2:29:42	8,465	+5:27
Pied de Col du Télégraphe	80.1	3:54:41	7,141	+1:53
Col du Télégraphe	92	5:08:34	7,531	+6:36
Pied de Col du Galibier	97.3	5:20:36	6,854	+1:48
Tunnel du Galibier	114.6	7:18:38	8,066	+13:32
Activation Canyon	115	7:19:48	7,352	+16:40
Col du Galibier	115.6	7:26:51	7,704	+18:01
Pied de Col de Sarenne	140.2	8:24:14	7,304	+16:10
Col de Sarenne	161	9:57:42	7,294	+22:35
FINISH	170	10:20:55	7,483	+25:35

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct, with nothing on it that names you. More in the privacy notice.

Ask me to remove my name

Your other races on this site are not linked to this page unless you ask. If you would like them listed here, use “Link my races” at the top of this page.

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.