Nicolas #13512

12:27:40

Finish time

12,290 / 12,733

Overall

Where you finished

Pool	Place	Of
Overall	12,290	12,733
Men	11,655	12,071
M5	1,216	1,255

What it took

Pool	Winner	Median
Overall	5:20:20+7:07:20	9:55:19+2:32:21
Men	5:20:20+7:07:20	9:53:09+2:34:31
M5	6:04:50+6:22:50	10:12:13+2:15:27

Winner and median are over classified finishers only. The gap is what you add to their time to get yours: + means you were that much slower, − that much faster.

The fun ranking

The 239th fastest Nicolas of 243. The quickest one did 5:33:54, the median Nicolas 9:51:22.

See the whole Nicolas ranking →

Among classified finishers only, ties sharing a place. Not an official classification — no timekeeper has ever scored this.

Club ranking

2nd of 2 from Ac questembert. Its quickest did 11:08:53, its median 11:48:16.

See the whole Ac questembert club page →

Among classified finishers from this club only, ties sharing a place. This is not the club classification, which scores each club on its 3 best times.

⚠️ This rider’s chip was only read at 10 of the 12 timing mats — segment times that need a missing mat can’t be computed, and this rider is absent from the corresponding leaderboards.

Room to improve: your biggest relative loss vs. the M5 median was on Col de Sarenne — 38:33 slower.

Your AI ride analysis

A 12290/12733 finish in category M5 leaves little doubt about where the effort went missing. Your smallest deficit came on Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez, only about 2 minutes off the M5 median there. You shed the most time relative to your own category on Col de Sarenne, about 39 minutes behind the M5 median. Longer tempo climbs in training would target exactly the kind of deficit you picked up on Col de Sarenne.

Generated once from the numbers on this page — not reviewed by a human, may be imperfect.

Watch the ride 🎬

0:00:00

Nicolas #135120 km

Rider move along the real course profile, positions interpolated between the timing mats from their split times.

Nicolas #13512 moving along the real course at their own recorded splits. Between two timing mats the dot is interpolated, so it glides where the rider may well have been suffering.

Race position along the course

Climbs & segments

Segment	Time	Rank	Top %	vs median
Start → Pied de la Croix de FerFlat / valley	32:20	12,517	87%	+3:44
Col de la Croix de FerClimb	2:19:11	13,016	91%	+23:38
Descente + vallée de la MaurienneFlat / valley	1:41:35	10,420	75%	+13:40
Col du TélégrapheClimb	1:37:51	13,186	96%	+29:04
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)Flat / valley	22:15	11,669	86%	+8:49
Col du GalibierClimb	mat missed at Col du Galibier	—	—	—
Descente du GalibierDescent	mat missed at Col du Galibier	—	—	—
Col de SarenneClimb	2:06:28	12,290	98%	+41:48
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’HuezDescent	23:52	8,677	69%	+2:11
Classement grimpeur (Croix de Fer + Télégraphe + Galibier)Combined	incomplete mat data	—	—	—
Classement descendeur (2 descentes cumulées)Combined	incomplete mat data	—	—	—

“Top %” = segment rank as a share of riders timed on that segment. “vs median” = time ahead of (green) or behind (red) the median rider.

How you compare, climb by climb

Segment	You	Stage winner	M5 leader	GC avg / median	M5 avg / median
Start → Pied de la Croix de Fer	32:20	Hugo #945 20:51	Steve #820 20:53	28:36 / 28:36	29:01 / 28:54
Col de la Croix de Fer	2:19:11	Simon #527 1:05:13	Steve #820 1:13:55	1:55:29 / 1:55:33	1:58:03 / 1:57:38
Descente + vallée de la Maurienne	1:41:35	Antoine BERGER 52:00	Antoine #2850 57:35	1:28:54 / 1:27:55	1:30:51 / 1:30:08
Col du Télégraphe	1:37:51	Luca CAVALLO 33:04	Antoine #2850 38:08	1:10:11 / 1:08:47	1:12:10 / 1:10:46
Télégraphe → Pied du Galibier (Valloire)	22:15	Robin #10 7:46	Antoine #2850 7:59	15:48 / 13:26	16:30 / 14:08
Col de Sarenne	2:06:28	Luca CAVALLO 39:52	Flip #2783 53:18	1:26:19 / 1:24:40	1:29:22 / 1:27:55
Descente Sarenne → Alpe d’Huez	23:52	Gustave #1746 3:39	?ukasz #17481 11:10	22:12 / 21:41	22:41 / 22:16

“Stage winner” = fastest rider on that segment, field-wide. “GC” = the whole classified field. Rows with no result for this rider (missed timing mat) are omitted here — see the table above for why.

Checkpoint splits

Checkpoint	Km	Time	Rank	vs median
START	0	0:00	—
Pied de Col de la Croix de Fer	14.8	32:20	12,149	+3:44
Col de la Croix de Fer	38.5	2:51:31	12,683	+27:16
Pied de Col du Télégraphe	80.1	4:33:06	11,976	+40:18
Col du Télégraphe	92	6:10:57	12,798	+1h08
Pied de Col du Galibier	97.3	6:33:12	12,173	+1h14
Tunnel du Galibier	114.6	9:01:53	13,610	+1h56
Pied de Col de Sarenne	140.2	9:57:20	12,044	+1h49
Col de Sarenne	161	12:03:48	12,155	+2h28
FINISH	170	12:27:40	12,290	+2h32

Times are chip times from the official race timekeeping. Search another rider.

Where this comes from. This page is built from the official results of L’Étape du Tour 2026, published by Sport Innovation / TimeTo. Names, bib numbers and times are reproduced from that public classification; the split analysis and rankings on this page are mine. Athletes who asked to be anonymous in the official results are anonymous here too.

Is this you, and would you rather it were not? Write to me and I will take your name and bib off this site, usually the same day. The result itself stays as an anonymous line so that the race totals and averages remain correct, with nothing on it that names you. More in the privacy notice.

Ask me to remove my name

Your other races on this site are not linked to this page unless you ask. If you would like them listed here, use “Link my races” at the top of this page.

One thing worth knowing before you write: removing your name here does not remove it from the timekeeper’s own results, which is where it is published and which this site only mirrors. To have it taken down at the source, ask the event organiser or the timekeeper directly — otherwise it stays online there, and any other site that mirrors them can pick it up again.